Thread View: oh.cast
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Tony Scott
Mon, 07 Sep 1992 03:06
commentary on SUEARN message.
Author: Tony Scott
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 03:06
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 03:06
48 lines
3173 bytes
3173 bytes
CAST collegues (fellow fishermen and women...) I have taken the liberty of propagating to the CAST bulletin board a copy of the latest SUEARN digest, a very long message which contains an important paper on the development of networking in the ex-Soviet Union. I felt justified in doing this as, even on a quick first reading, I was struck by the number of research opportunities for CAST folks opening up: the opportunity to study the development of network use in an almost 'green fields' situation being not the least of these. I was also struck by the potential of linking these developments with our recent Infoport discussions. We've been thinking of the Infoport perhaps as a free-for-all market place (not free in the $ sense, more in the fisticuffs sense) in which Columbus, as market "owner" would somehow be neutral. But maybe we should think of Columbus, and OSU in particular, giving a helping hand to some of our Russian and other East European colleagues. I seem to remember a lot of OSU folks had firs hand experience of the coup and counter-coup, that the College of Business has intentions to develop/assist with MBA programs, and so on. Even if we 'electronically twinned' with one city, assisted them to tie in to the Infoport, it would have a considerable impact. I was witness (electronically) to the first steps of RELCOM, SUEARN and GLASNET. Some people tried to get themselves positioned as gatekeepers, rather than facilitators of networking; others were very creative in the use of networking to promote their own careers; some risked their lives using networking to support the counter-coup, including Gorbachev supporters who saw Yeltsin as dangerously volatile. It will not be simple. Networking with the xUSSR is different now from the recent past when you couldn't get error-correcting protocols to work because the KGB computer that was sampling the messages didn't reconstruct them properly. One way in which it is very different is the laboratory it provides in different strategies of ownership and co-operative principle, ranging from those who seek to make large profits to those who think free network access is the true mark of a democratic society. This range includes people in the academy, not just the new entrepreneurs out to make an honest buck. But then, what models do they have to follow? Tony Scott, Art Education & ACCAD, Ohio State University ps I left in the details of the Norway conference & the Fax gate to the xUSSR. I think it is significant that we should now be thinking of Russia and Norway as "co-regional", and note the developing use of 'faxgate' technology both here at OSU and in the xUSSR
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads