Article View: oh.general
Article #245Re: Income tax repealed....maybe...
From: Richard Chalk
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:00
49 lines
3139 bytes
3139 bytes
In article <4q995o$1eb@miso.wwa.com>, janik@sashimi.wwa.com (Edward J. Janik) wrote: >>>: >What is H.R. 3039? It is a bill indtroduced by Representative >>>: >Dan Schaefer to replace the Income Tax with a fifteen percent >>>: >national sales tax. >>> >>>: Ah, the "Let's give the rich even MORE money, screw the poor >>>: and middle class" tax. >>> >>>How does this compute? If I make 10,000 a year, I would pay 1,500.00 >>>Now If I made 100,000 a year I would pay 15,000 a year. >>> Fifteen percent is fifteen percent. >>>Regards, >>> Chris >> >>Only if you SPEND everything you make... the more you make, the less >>likely this is to occur. >> >>There are no profits without people. When someone has more than they >>can possibly spend, why would they still want more and more? Ego? >>A compulsion based on fear? Nobody becomes successful in a vacuum. >>Progressive taxation does make sense. If the poor and the middle >>class have less spending power, the rich will not make as much. Plain >>and simple. Trickle up. The only theory that works in the real world. >> >> Well, that's true to a point, but the "rich" spend much more than the poor, so the theory is still partially valid. Furthermore, the rich spend money which results in employment for many. As an interesting side observation, a married person earning $100,000 per year, with two dependent children, a dependent wife, and reasonable tax planning, will pay approximately $15,000 Federal Tax anyway, and it wouldn't take 36 pages of paperwork, and the whole tax department, a large portion of government, thousands of accountants/tax preparers, and at least three companies who write tax computing software, to make that happen (not to mention the hundreds of books on the subject) Well, that would put lots of people out of work, maybe it's a bad idea after all....<(:- Richard Richard Chalk PHONE: 770-992-3700 4330 Sprucebough Drive FAX: 770-998-3781 Marietta, GA 30062 EMAIL: rchalk@mindspring.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4q9e8h$fga@mule1.mindspring.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4q7sk1$ug@nntpa.cb.lucent.com> <4q8v47$7n7@gaia.cc.gatech.edu> <4q92dh$3o6@Mercury.mcs.com> <4q995o$1eb@miso.wwa.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e1e4,7bc10164a3063e56 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1e4,public X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,7bc10164a3063e56 X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public X-Google-Thread: 10fef2,7bc10164a3063e56 X-Google-Attributes: gid10fef2,public X-Google-Thread: fa15f,7bc10164a3063e56 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa15f,public X-Google-Thread: 10e835,7bc10164a3063e56 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e835,public X-Google-Thread: 106a7c,7bc10164a3063e56 X-Google-Attributes: gid106a7c,public X-Google-Thread: 116100,7bc10164a3063e56 X-Google-Attributes: gid116100,public From: rchalk@mindspring.com (Richard Chalk) Subject: Re: Income tax repealed....maybe... Date: 1996/06/19 Message-ID: <4q9e8h$fga@mule1.mindspring.com> X-Deja-AN: 161048509 references: <4q7sk1$ug@nntpa.cb.lucent.com> <4q8v47$7n7@gaia.cc.gatech.edu> <4q92dh$3o6@Mercury.mcs.com> <4q995o$1eb@miso.wwa.com> organization: mindspring.com newsgroups: oh.general,ne.general,atl.general,chi.general,ga.general,in.general,ne.nearnet.general