🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: oh.general
Article #772

Re: missing the point [Re: Conservatives Should Boycott Bush This November]

#772
From: Resident Samuel
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:43
86 lines
5239 bytes
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:58:52 GMT, PMDavis <pmdlandarch@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:18:14 GMT, "Lou P. Garrew" <howling@moon.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Trailer Pork Resident Schmucky wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 06:33:50 GMT, "Lou P. Garrew" <howling@moon.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> >Trailer Pork Resident Schmucky wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 07:40:57 GMT, "Lou P. Garrew" <howling@moon.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > It ultimately insures a dingwally of a case of inflation,
>>> >> > which wipes out people on low or fixed incomes.
>>> >>
>>> >> Of course you liberals prefer the specter of deflation, exacerbated by
>>> >> pissant trade alliances like nafta and gatt, coupled with NO form of
>>> >> livable safe fixed income return...
>>> >
>>> >Hey, Schmucky, thanks for describing what the Republicans did to the
>>> >USA in the Twenties!
>>> 
>>> Which party was pro-slavery in the 1860s?
>>> 
>>Once again, by changing the subject you concede that I am right and you
>>are wrong. Why don't you just tattoo that on your forehead, Schmucky,
>>to match the KICK ME tattoo on your back?
>>
>>Now, Schmucky, maybe you've noticed how the Democrats have changed
>>since the days of slavery. Certainly many Americans of color have
>>noticed.
>
>Rather than say "Work our fields, and we will keep you clothed,
>sheltered, and fed as terms of servitude", the Democrats now say "Vote
>for us, and we will keep you clothed, sheltered and fed as terms of
>servitude."  One can argue that the change is less substitive than the
>Republican alternative, which is to, "Plan ahead, apply yourself, and
>you will be able to cloth, shelter, and feed yourself through your own
>efforts."

Don't worry Lou with annoying factual commentary please...


>>But let's discuss the Republicans. Which party pretty
>>much ran the USA in the post-bellum era? The REPUBLICANS! So, who
>>didn't fight Jim Crow & the Black Codes? Who didn't support
>>Union troops when they were occupying the South & battling
>>the Klan in a guerrila war? Who left colored men to hang,
>>literally & figuratively, while they loyally voted Republican
>>for DECADES? Which party GLADLY tolerated grandfather clauses
>>& poll taxes & literacy tests which were DESIGNED to keep
>>Negro men from voting? Hint: it was the REPUBLICANS! The same
>>party that sent militia to shoot honest workmen during strikes,
>>gave the 7th Cav. outdated single-shot weapons to use against
>>Indians with repeaters, & took bribes from rail barons for
>>favorable legislation.
>>
>>Got any more ignorance you need cured, Schmucky? Keep talking
>>& I'll help!
>>
>>Lou P. Garrew, at your service!
>
>
>What history book have you not read?  

Or more accurately what history book (singular) has he ever read?

> Republicans helped blacks hold
>office and adminster public affairs during reconstruction.  The Jim
>Crow laws and the Black Codes went into place after the Republicans
>pulled out at the end of reconstruction.  One could NOT be a
>Republican and a member of the KKK at the same time.  The KKK would
>only allow Democrats to join.  The southern political machines that
>kept blacks from voting through poll taxes and literary tests were
>exclusively Democratic.  After Reconstruction the Republican Party
>wasn't even viable in much of  the south up until the Reagan
>Revolution.

Factual.

>(Honest workman work for the their employer, they don't go on strike,
>by definition.)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <imd4p0lqpfdl0piuuejvmbtc7l923edc2u@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <533fo09c7gbq1bqclh8j5qib2ja300v2rn@4ax.com> <735b8de2.0411060909.57f91e5@posting.google.com> <6t6qo09tqt980kvnilrf25hi2cjb06tt7j@4ax.com> <735b8de2.0411071151.6f86b704@posting.google.com> <9t7to0pqni98j8l71dsqt17r3ig6truef1@4ax.com> <418F2298.B81CC42C@moon.com> <lf6vo0tg9j7pa5127c0asr4cg23mn33c05@4ax.com> <41906459.BC2CAC19@moon.com> <mcr1p0517u75njdfhsqas7comcqed325sh@4ax.com> <4191B22E.78660B2A@moon.com> <9674p0lad1ln9sg9u76ehac64u6lauvvge@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 106a7c,6b4be10de756a3c0
X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,6b4be10de756a3c0
X-Google-Thread: 1026d8,6b4be10de756a3c0
X-Google-Thread: fda71,6b4be10de756a3c0
X-Google-Thread: 10637b,6b4be10de756a3c0
X-Google-Attributes: gid106a7c,gid1073ca,gid1026d8,gidfda71,gid10637b,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!newsfeed3.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!easynews-local!news.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Resident Samuel <raccoon@forest.net>
Newsgroups: oh.general,co.general,co.politics,ia.talk.misc,soc.veterans
Subject: Re: missing the point [Re: Conservatives Should Boycott Bush This November]
Organization: umbrella corproation
Reply-To: nemesis
Message-ID: <imd4p0lqpfdl0piuuejvmbtc7l923edc2u@4ax.com>
References: <533fo09c7gbq1bqclh8j5qib2ja300v2rn@4ax.com> <735b8de2.0411060909.57f91e5@posting.google.com> <6t6qo09tqt980kvnilrf25hi2cjb06tt7j@4ax.com> <735b8de2.0411071151.6f86b704@posting.google.com> <9t7to0pqni98j8l71dsqt17r3ig6truef1@4ax.com> <418F2298.B81CC42C@moon.com> <lf6vo0tg9j7pa5127c0asr4cg23mn33c05@4ax.com> <41906459.BC2CAC19@moon.com> <mcr1p0517u75njdfhsqas7comcqed325sh@4ax.com> <4191B22E.78660B2A@moon.com> <9674p0lad1ln9sg9u76ehac64u6lauvvge@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 87
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:43:42 GMT