🚀 go-pugleaf

Resident Samuel <raccoon@forest.net> wrote in message news:<6t6qo09tqt980kvnilrf25hi2cjb06tt7j@4ax.com>...
> On 6 Nov 2004 09:09:40 -0800, franklinjefferson@hotmail.com
> (FranklinJefferson) wrote:
quoting from [http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041105/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_sticker_shock_4
]
> 
> >We cannot create jobs fast enough
> 
> Drop fucking dead franklin.

I assume this is the best you can do in the way of a reasoned
argument?

I assume you must LIKE deficit spending?

>> , to pay for the budget deficit that
>> will emerge from the past election.  The party of big spenders, the
>> Republicans, are setting the stage for the biggest and potentially
>> most dangerous budget of all times.  It will come at a time when
>> demographics suggest that the earning power, spending ability, and
>> savings ability of consumers will shrink dramatically as the
>> population of the U.S. ages.  Deficit spending is like a cancer, it
>> grows and grows as those emboldened by the election  reward those
who
>> voted for them.  In the 1960's it was the Democrats lead by
President
>> Johnson, more lately however spending has been lead by the
Republicans
>> including primarily Ronald Regan, and our current president.  It is
>> going to go from bad to worst.  The question is who will pay the
>> bills?  Higher interest charges, higher medical insurance costs,
>> higher energy prices, lower levels of income, and a declining
dollar
>> are all hidden taxes that are rapidly increasing the cost of
living.
>> Those who believe inflation does not exist need to look at what the
>> average family is really paying in increased costs.  Over the next
>> four years the needy will become more needy and desperate, the
middle
>> class will see their economic base deteriorate and the rich will be
>> relatively richer, with the exception of those who financial
leverage
>> to create illiquid wealth.
>> 
>> President Bush has lofty ambitions, he is out to create his own
>> legacy.  His legacy and that of the current congress will most
likely
>> be truly held by anyone from currently between the age of 1 and 55
who
>> have to pay the bills of spending gone wild.  Sooner or latter the
>> stock market will confront this folly, as the federal government
>> spends what we do not have, lowers taxes to reward the supporters
of
>> elected officials, and removes our ability to fund infrastructure
at
>> the local level.  Eventually collapse is inevitable.  Today the
market
>> celebrates job creation, tomorrow or a year from now, it will have
>> face the reality of declining consumer consumption, and a possible
>> confluence of negative economic events that could lead us into a
>> lengthy downward spiral.