🚀 go-pugleaf

Bush's Last Days wrote:

> Uncle Samuel wrote:
> 
>> Bush's Last Days wrote:
>> You really are a dummy liar aren't you:
>>
>> http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc.jpg
>>
>> "2. If no signs of intimidation techniques have emerged yet, launch a 
>> "pre-emptive strike"


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40925

An election-day manual issued by the Democratic National Committee urges 
local operatives to stir up talk about potential voter intimidation even 
if there is no evidence.

A section of the 66-page manual [pdf file, obtained by the Drudge 
Report, says, "If no signs of intimidation techniques have emerged yet, 
launch a 'pre-emptive strike.'"


The Democrats' plan will be distributed in dozens of states, according 
to Drudge, who says a top DNC official confirmed the manual's authenticity.

The official claimed, however, that the notion of crying wolf on any 
voter intimidation is "absurd."

"We all know the Republicans are going to try to steal the election by 
scaring people and confusing people," the top DNC source explained.

The manual advises local Democrats to:


Issue a press release
i. Reviewing Republican tactic [sic] used in the past in your area

ii. Quoting party/minority/civil rights leadership as denouncing tactics 
that discourage people from voting

Prime minority leadership to discuss the issue in the media; providing 
talking points

Place stories in which minority leadership expresses concern about the 
threat of intimidation tactics

Warn local newspapers not to accept advertising that is not properly 
disclaimed or that contains false warnings about voting requirements 
and/or about what happens at the polls


Leaked page reveals push to use tactic of 'pre-emptive strike'

By Peggy Lowe, Rocky Mountain News
October 15, 2004

Democrats got caught with their election playbook open Thursday when a 
leaked page was published urging operatives to lodge a "pre-emptive 
strike" of claiming voter intimidation, whether it's true or not.



-- 
��ࡱ�