🚀 go-pugleaf

max@yu.know (max) wrote in message news:<808b3f9bfb5d4465474deec9773c2d7a@userbeam.net>...
> Boycott Bush In 2004
> By Robert Locke 
> 
> Like most Republicans, I supported Bush the last time, but have
> finally been forced to the conclusion that the immigration-reduction
> cause, and the conservative cause generally, would be better off if he
> lost in 2004. So I urge the reader to withhold his vote and write the
> president why.
> 
> The calculation of the Bush administration and the globalist wing of
> the Republican party is very simple: they can count on your voting
> Republican in November no matter what. Therefore, they believe that
> they can get away with anything they want, and that if they get away
> with it this time, they will be able to get away with it next time,
> and the time after that, forever.
> 
> Frankly, they are right unless conservative voters do something to
> disrupt this calculus.
> 
> Karl Rove is right now telling Bush that he doesn't have to fear a
> revolt from anti-globalist Republicans because "they have nowhere to
> go." Well, they've forgotten a great American place: home.
> 
> I'm not suggesting you vote Democrat, it being an entirely different
> matter to actually support the opposition as opposed to withholding
> your vote from your own party when it strays from its principles. But
> I am suggesting that you either not cast a vote for president or write
> in a suitable protest candidate. Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, an old
> acquaintance and founding chairman of the House Immigration Reform
> Caucus, would be the obvious choice.
> 
> Even before Bush announced his proposal to legalize virtually all
> illegal aliens in this country and open the borders to everyone on the
> globe who can underbid an American for a job, many conservatives were
> critical of him. Here's a partial list of why:
> 
>   * He endorsed the revolutionary Grutter decision that placed
>   nakedly anti-white racial preferences in the U.S. Constitution.
> 
>   * He has refused to tell the truth about the 1,300-year-old
>   civilizational war we are in, calling our Islamist enemies merely
>   "terrorists," as if they were a threat on a par with the ETA or
>   the Weathermen.
> 
>   * He has subjected the American people to intrusive random
>   security checks at airports while continuing to protect Muslim
>   foreigners from the racial profiling their own countries
>   practice.
> 
>   * He has left in office high-level Clinton appointees whose
>   competence and patriotism are dubious and whose ideology is
>   openly liberal.
> 
>   * He has left in place a feminist agenda in the armed forces
>   which kills women and impairs our defense.
> 
>   * He has pushed and signed the insanely egalitarian, hugely
>   expensive, and unconstitutional "No Child Left Behind" Act.
> 
>   * He has legitimated the white-guilt theory that is rotting
>   Western Civilization, giving a speech in Africa denouncing
>   historic white America in terms that exceeded Bill Clinton.
> 
>   * Then he sent $15 billion to African dictators under the guise
>   of fighting AIDS, a disease almost wholly caused by immoral
>   living.
> 
>   * He has declined to respond in any serious way to the Democrats'
>   outrageous blockade of his judicial appointments.
> 
>   * He has renewed the funding of the radical anti-American
>   organization UNICEF.
> 
>   * He has signed the largest expansion of the federal welfare
>   state in a generation, the funding of prescription drugs for
>   Medicare recipients.
> 
>   * He has signed the patently unconstitutional McCain-Feingold
>   law, the aim of which is to subject political speech to
>   bureaucratic controls as in the soft-totalitarian European Union.
> 
>   * He has sought to buy off social conservatives with his faith-
>   based initiative which, far from helping strengthen religion in
>   America, will co-opt churches and other religious organizations
>   by making them dependent on federal largesse.
> 
>   * He has evaded the issue of gay marriage and then proposed a
>   constitutionally-dangerous amendment that he knows will be almost
>   impossible to pass.
> 
>   * He has continued the free-trade extremism that is gutting
>   America's industrial base and has given us a jobless recovery.
> 
> As a result of these betrayals of conservative principles, Bush was
> barely deserving of support prior to his (latest) immigration-
> expansion initiative. With it, he has finally crossed the line into
> being a proactively destructive force in American life who must be
> stopped before he destroys the Republican party, the country, or both.
> 
> I am inexorably forced to the following conclusion: Bush is no more
> than a wolf in sheep's clothing, a liberal and a globalist who merely
> pretends to be a conservative, like he pretends to perform manual
> labor on his luxury ranch in Crawford, in order to get elected. He
> proactively believes in the racial sodomization of America, in
> globalism, in his fantasy that everyone in the world, in the Middle
> East as in California, is going to just forget the intergroup
> conflicts that have been the driving force of history for thousands of
> years and just "get along" under a bright blue sky of stock options.
> He even sees a family interest, through the future career of his
> dynastic heir his nephew, in the Hispanicization of America. His
> idiocy is not the product of mistaken advice and it is not the product
> of tactics: he genuinely believes in every dumb thing he says and
> every dumb thing he does. He is not our friend; he is just another
> sector of enemy territory.
> 
> The Republican establishment does not take grassroots conservatives
> like immigration reformers seriously unless it is forced to. Its
> priority is its careers and its core agenda is corporatist globalism,
> dressed up in conservative veneer just thick enough to fool the
> gullible rednecks. Nothing less than bringing down a Republican
> president, which would wreck many of their careers personally, will
> get their attention.
> 
> But oh boy, would it do that!
> 
> 
> http://www.americandaily.com/article/4687

Jim