🚀 go-pugleaf

UN inspectors WERE in! And Iraq had NO weapons, as even Bush said (oh, yeah,
he had some intentions, dreams, plans, poems, blah blah).

And yes, my questions is why the idiot did not attack N Korea, because he
really had all the proof in the world that they have the nukes!

Only one answer: he wanted to finish a family dispute with Saddam!
And 1000+ Americans died for it.

Go volunteer for Iraq, man - you are ignorant enough so that nobody would
notice if you are missing.

"mrcranky" <mrcranky899@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:30ef0d1c.0409291113.5e3b1552@posting.google.com...
> Oooooh!  So I guess we forget all about UN Security Council Resolution
> 1441 that called for Iraq to disarm and allow UN inspectors in, and
> all of the trouble the inspectors had trying to inspect.
>
> And, of course, we don't want to even think about how the North
> Koreans agreed to limit their nuclear reactor work, and how all of the
> checks were working just fine, and all of a sudden, *whoops*, they had
> nuclear weapons.
>
> Nope, no proof.
>
> "garbaman" <garbaman@hotmoil.com> wrote in message
news:<cqqdnTr0jKJSlsfcRVn-iw@comcast.com>...
> > > So, let's see.  You would fire the police chief who evacuates a school
> >  because
> > > a bomb threat was phoned in, if no bomb were found?
> >
> > Yes, if the phone call came from the police chief (Bush, Powell) - as it
was
> > the case with the phony WMDs - the whole world laughed at them when
Powell
> > was shaking a vial with
> > some water in it (:-) in front of the UN assembly - you do not go to war
> > based on such shitty, self-served "proof".
> >
> > But I guess you are that kind of sheep that goes down with the leader
even
> > if it is clear that
> > the leader is an idiotic ram! Good riddance!
> >
> > "mrcranky" <mrcranky899@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:30ef0d1c.0409281037.3d7c92d@posting.google.com...
> > > delgase@yahoo.com (Frank Delgase) wrote in message
> >  news:<a08cd50a.0409261116.7babfc59@posting.google.com>...
> > > > Dear Fellow Voters;
> > > >
> > > > Election time is near and I still don't know
> > > > who to vote for. If Weapons of Mass Destruction are
> > > > found, Bush is my man. If no WMDs are found, Kerry
> > > > all the way. Why? I don't like to be fooled into believing
> > > > that something exists, when in reality it never existed.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Frank Delgase
> > >
> > > So, let's see.  You would fire the police chief who evacuates a school
> >  because
> > > a bomb threat was phoned in, if no bomb were found?