🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1989Jan30.175744.11411@sq.uucp> ian@sq.com (Ian F. Darwin) writes:
>Has anybody picked up the "official" release of Kerberos yet
>or is everybody too busy packing up for USENIX?

There is an export restriction specified all over both the posting to the
net and the distributiuon at MIT. Kerberos MAY NOT BE EXPORTED FROM THE US!

Therefore, no, no-one has grabbed it, and if they have, they better not
admit it. :-)

-- 
C. Harald Koch		NTT Systems, Inc., Toronto, Ontario
chk@zorac.dciem.dnd.ca, chk@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu, chk@chkent.UUCP
"I give you my phone number. If you worry, call me. I'll make you happy."

In article <1421@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca> chk@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca (C. Harald Koch) writes:
>There is an export restriction specified all over both the posting to the
>net and the distributiuon at MIT. Kerberos MAY NOT BE EXPORTED FROM THE US!
>
>Therefore, no, no-one has grabbed it, and if they have, they better not
>admit it. :-)

Actually, it says that exporters are assumed to have done the legal
necessaries. If I ftp Kerberos from MIT, it is MIT that is the exporter
and I would be in the clear. I am merely the IMPORTER. My conscience is
clear. :-)

To be truthful, I haven't bothered though. We looked at Kerberos last
fall, and found it not quite suitable for our rather specialized
environment.

Disclaimer: These opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those
of my employer.

Keith Hanlan			 {uunet!attcan!}utgpu!bnr-vpa!bnr-fos!atreus!keithh
Bell-Northern Research
Ottawa, Canada