Re: Helmet Law Fraud

Article View: ont.bicycle

Article #102

#102

From: shamus
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 1996 00:00

12 lines
1082 bytes

In article <DnpA41.4tr@freenet.carleton.ca>, ab833@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(Avery Burdett) wrote:

> The following is an extract of a message posted to rec.bicycles.soc
> concerning bicycle helmet papers presented at recent conferences held in
> Australia. It appears that data from the NZ helmet law demonstrates failure
> in a manner similar to data from Australian helmet laws. The posting implies
> that universal helmet laws in Australia, NZ and more recently in Canada, have
> not only no scientific basis, .............


so, you are suggesting/inferring that we all toss our helments?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <shamus-0303962248450001@van-as-06b11.direct.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <DnpA41.4tr@freenet.carleton.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fe616,3dced83283882e68
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe616,public
X-Google-Thread: f9fae,3dced83283882e68
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9fae,public
From: shamus@macwest.org (shamus)
Subject: Re: Helmet Law Fraud
Date: 1996/03/04
Message-ID: <shamus-0303962248450001@van-as-06b11.direct.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 141974744
references: <DnpA41.4tr@freenet.carleton.ca>
organization: Internet Direct
newsgroups: ont.bicycle,bc.cycling

Reply to Parent Message