🚀 go-pugleaf

 (ed_blakeley@my-dejanews.com) writes:
>   I am not declaring any such impartiality that the term "faq" implies.
> Avery's website reads like a fucking manifesto. You can't expect anyone
> reasonably intelligent to swallow this as an FAQ... as you do. But hey, no
> one ever accused you of being overly intelligent.

Oh, dear what an angry little boy you are. Can you provide any information
to counter what it is which upsets you so? You've contributed abuse, but do
you have any *value at all* to add to this thread?

We are still waiting for information requested after you had your last little
tantrum:

   (ed_blakeley@my-dejanews.com) writes:
   >   What useless drivel. Where are all the statistics on how a helmet
   > prevented a hospital visit, or concussion?

   You'd be more convincing if you posted the statistics yourself.

> 
> In article <77iu6n$a41$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
>   tkunich@diabloresearch.com wrote:
>> In article <77ilbl$1m0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
>>   ed_blakeley@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >   I agree on all of your arguements, especially your wrap-up about the
>> > statistics. However, I still believe that the Canadian study Burdett keeps
>> > quoting is very misleading, and the so called helmet "faq" is a joke and a
>> > disgrace to the impartial tone that usually should accompany such a page.
>>
>> Just like the impartiality you've demonstrated so amply?

--
Avery Burdett
Ottawa, Ontario