🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ont.bicycle
Article #41

Re: Alberta Rejects MHL

#41
From: Cyber Rod
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 1998 00:00
50 lines
3165 bytes
>Sounds like you're tiring of those old common sense anti-MHL
>arguments. Here's some food for thought:
> 
>1. MHL's are being accepted in BC without much protest, what could
>it be next? Probably bicycle plates, licensing cyclists, liability
>and medical insurance, safety inspections, pay parking.  All will
>hit your pocketbook, not for any tangible benefit- but mostly to
>hire more government beaurocrats.
> 
>2. Witness BC- the MHL  just allows the government to cop out of
>any real concerns for the safety of cyclists. 
> 
>3. Can you consider yourself an environmentalist wearing a piece of
>foam  plastic on your head that comes from the petrochemical
>industry, can't be repaired or recycled and requires frequent
>replacement?
> 
>4. Do you feel comfortable being forced to consume a particular
>disposable commodity, and what do you suppose is the effect on the
>market?   Why is it difficult to purchase a helmet in BC that meets
>the latest standards? The BC Gov't is in bed with industry.   
> 
>5. One of the latest I've heard- in the March issue of Cycle
>Therapy- MHL's were introduced to appease motorists who consider
>cyclists more than just annoying. That one doesn't sit well with
>me, I'm thinking of getting a rear view mirror.


You think I really care? I'll always wear my helmet. It has saved my 
life before and did a pretty damn good job. 

Regarding whether being an environemtalist or not, I think these days 
you try to do as much as possible to be environmental friendly. However,
nobody is perfect. How come we don't stop using our car to reduce the CO2
emission? The CO2 concentration's increasing every year in the atmosphere,
everyone is concerned, but we are not doing much about it are we?

OK. that's getting away from the topic, gonna start another pointless debate.. ;-)

Rodney

Replace the "y" with "u" when replying.
   *******************************************************************
   ********     *** CYBER ROD , CYCLIST OF THE FUTURE ***     ********
   *******************************************************************
               #####  UBC OFF-ROAD CYCLING TEAM REP  #####
                 ... __o    __o    __o    __o    __o      
               ...  -\<,   -\<,   -\<,   -\<,   -\<,      
              ... (_)/(_)(_)/(_)(_)/(_)(_)/(_)(_)/(_)      
Technical Details
Message-ID: <St7K.1266$Jb.1580213@brie.direct.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <6bfa39$smu@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.980220131919.11500C-100000@vtn1> <34F30780.7790@interlynx.net> <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0 <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.980227225346.16171C-100000@vtn1>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fe616,a4d665648453c70
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe616,public
X-Google-Thread: 10e08b,a4d665648453c70
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e08b,public
X-Google-Thread: f9fae,a4d665648453c70
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9fae,public
From: rhsy@Direct.CA (Cyber Rod)
Subject: Re: Alberta Rejects MHL
Date: 1998/03/01
Message-ID: <St7K.1266$Jb.1580213@brie.direct.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 329634846
References: <6bfa39$smu@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.980220131919.11500C-100000@vtn1> <34F30780.7790@interlynx.net> <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0 <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.980227225346.16171C-100000@vtn1>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 22:45:06 PST
Reply-To: ME
Organization: Internet Direct Inc.
Newsgroups: ont.bicycle,bc.cycling,rec.bicycles.soc