Article View: ont.bicycle
Article #72Re: More on Helmet Fraud
From: Steve Peringer
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 00:00
45 lines
2850 bytes
2850 bytes
ab833@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Avery Burdett) wrote: >You are right it's about Big Brother. But helmet zealots don't separate the >two. Big Brother gets heavily lobbied by people making outrageous claims >about the efficacy of helmets. For example, Dr. Robert Cushman, a prominent >local helmet zealot, claimed on TV that mandatory helmet legislation would >prevent 75% of cycling fatalities (on the basis that 75% of cyclist >fatalities result from head injuries). So he meant all of those who die from >a bang to the head. He made this claim even though cyclists are dying with >helmets on their heads, just like in OZ. Cycling fatalities are rare in >Ottawa, but four of the last six cyclists killed here in the past 3 years were >wearing helmets. This thread is seriously leading towards alt.politics and away from rec.cycling. Either way, it should be heard. I don't mind people telling me that I should be wearing a helmet. I don't even mind people telling me (whether true or not) that it will save my life. What I do mind is people I don't know telling me that I *have* to wear a helmet, or pay a $90 fine. First, it makes no sense. Second, if they were really concerned about my health, they would just force me to buy a helmet with the $90 instead of keeping it and paving more roads over. >>You call it paranoic; others call it the "better safe than sorry" >>philosophy. >Only the four in Ottawa weren't safe, but may have been led to believe they >were. >Hey, but if you want to try and protect yourself against every >conceivable accident or mishap, you won't get any objection here. I have a comfortable helmet and see no reason why I should not wear it. Also, my nephews have a nasty habit of doing exactly what I do, and if there is any truth to the side of helmets saving your live when you're going 11kph (like they do), *my* wearing a helmet may just save *their* lives. And comments like the above about protecting myself "against every conceivable accident or mishap" really don't add to the conversation. I have my reasons for wearing a helmet. I don't preach or insult, even backhandedly. Steve Peringer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4jntog$5ar@steel.interlog.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4iosks$h2o@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4jde76$46l@steel.interlog.com> <4jeteg$qm4@freenet-news.carleton.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe616,18dc15842892d86c X-Google-Attributes: gidfe616,public X-Google-Thread: f9fae,18dc15842892d86c X-Google-Attributes: gidf9fae,public X-Google-Thread: fde8f,18dc15842892d86c X-Google-Attributes: gidfde8f,public From: peringer@interlog.com (Steve Peringer) Subject: Re: More on Helmet Fraud Date: 1996/04/01 Message-ID: <4jntog$5ar@steel.interlog.com> X-Deja-AN: 145186828 references: <4iosks$h2o@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <4jde76$46l@steel.interlog.com> <4jeteg$qm4@freenet-news.carleton.ca> organization: InterLog Internet Services newsgroups: ont.bicycle,bc.cycling,uk.rec.cycling