Article View: ont.bicycle
Article #87Re: More on Helmet Fraud
From: Jody Levine
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 00:00
47 lines
2876 bytes
2876 bytes
In article <4ihihp$v37@nuacht.iol.ie> Garry Lee <glee@iol.ie> writes: >The quoting of opinion from one country which is supposed to supplant >the evidence from numerous other studies is itself dodgy science. > >Sometimes humans have to forget statistics and use their heads. This is rediculous. If you're going to question statistics, you must do it intelligently (i.e. use your head). >Why do motorcyclists wear them? I've been keeping an eye on this since I started motorcycling about seven years ago. A motorcycle helmet will reduce your chance of death from head injury by %50, resulting in an overall fataity decrease of about 7%, since most people die from chest wounds, bleeding, etc. Helmet law enactment generally reduces fatalities by a few percent, usually because usage rates were high before law enactment. What was surprising was how, in Quebec, the moto helmet law reduced the accident rate significantly (can't remember the number) presumably due to the eye protection that comes with many helmets. Yet eye protection is not required on a motorcycle in Canada. I'm posting this from memory, so some of this could be a bit off. I wear a helmet because even though I'm less likely to bonk my head than break a leg, the results of head injury can be more severe. I also find my helmet comfortable, in that it does a great job at keeping crap out of my face, it keeps my hair from turning into a tangled mess, and keeps the wind noise down. >If you are heading towards the ground in mid-air would you prefer to >be wearing one? But how likely are you to be heading towards the ground in mid air? I once broke my wrist when I fell on a patch of ice, but I don't walk around with wrist protectors. If the down-under stats showed a drastic increase in usage but no decrease in injuries, we must ask *why*. Either head injuries are so infrequent that they don't show up in the stats, other factors such as false sense of security come into play, or helmets don't work in the real world (most people don't wear them properly anyway). What do you think it is? >Have a read of this. >http://www.bhsi.org/webdocs/henderso.htm Post the relevant bits so that we can discuss it. Jody
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1996Mar18.150348.9392@rd.hydro.on.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<DoE6Ey.Mno@freenet.carleton.ca> <4ihihp$v37@nuacht.iol.ie>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe616,18dc15842892d86c X-Google-Attributes: gidfe616,public X-Google-Thread: fde8f,18dc15842892d86c X-Google-Attributes: gidfde8f,public X-Google-Thread: f9fae,18dc15842892d86c X-Google-Attributes: gidf9fae,public From: jlevine@rd.hydro.on.ca (Jody Levine) Subject: Re: More on Helmet Fraud Date: 1996/03/18 Message-ID: <1996Mar18.150348.9392@rd.hydro.on.ca> X-Deja-AN: 143270639 references: <DoE6Ey.Mno@freenet.carleton.ca> <4ihihp$v37@nuacht.iol.ie> organization: Ontario Hydro - Research Division newsgroups: ont.bicycle,bc.cycling,uk.rec.cycling