Thread View: ont.events
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Veronica Archibald
Thu, 28 Jan 1993 17:46
Radford M. Neal, 11 February 1993: AI
Author: Veronica Archibald
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 17:46
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 17:46
51 lines
3255 bytes
3255 bytes
Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
(GB = Galbraith Building, 35 St. George Street)
-------------------------------------------------------------
AI
GB221, at 11:00 a.m., 11 February 1993
Radford M. Neal
Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
" Learning Concepts with Hierarchical Latent Variable Models "
To make sense of the world, we must learn how to describe the multitude
of things we sense using concepts that capture the underlying
structure that is present. Often, we must do this in an unsupervised
fashion, without any external guidance as to what concepts are
appropriate. Understanding and automating this process are major
challenges for AI.
In scientific investigations, exploratory data analysis has a similar
aim, and has long been tackled using semi-automatic methods. One
approach used explains the relationships among a number of independent
items by postulating unobservable "latent variables", associated with
each item, that determine the distributions for the observed
attributes. The simplest such models employ a single, discrete "latent
class" variable. Many of the similarities between individual animals
can be explained by the concept of a "species", for example.
I will briefly describe work I have done on Bayesian latent class
analysis, which includes a radical approach to the vexing problem of
determining the appropriate number of latent classes. I also describe
work on learning more general latent variable models expressed using
"belief networks", in which an item can be in more than one "class".
To explain the symptoms of patients in terms of underlying diseases,
for example, one must allow for the possibility that the patient has
more than one disease.
Mostly, however, I will discuss a hierarchical generalization of
latent class models, in which similarities in the descriptions of
the various classes are expressed in terms of classes at a higher
level. The practice in biology of grouping several species into
a "genus", several genera into a "family", etc. is an example of
such a model. High-level classes can be defined in terms not only
of concrete similarities, but also on the basis of more abstract
characteristics, such as which attributes distinguish between the
low-level classes, and which are irrelevant. Consequently, rather
than merely providing a coarser level of interpretation, such a
high-level class structure can also bias the construction of low-level
classes in favour of those with a coherent high-level structure.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads