Thread View: ont.micro
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by n
Sun, 13 Jan 1985 01:45
Re: These newsgroups are proposed for deletion
Author: n
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 1985 01:45
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 1985 01:45
13 lines
901 bytes
901 bytes
Mark, the proposed groups ont.micro, ont.micro.mac, and ont.singles are for
information specific to ONTARIO. Why burden the net with text that is only
of interest to a local geographic area?? Only if people would use these groups
where it makes sense to.
References: <284@lsuc.UUCP>, <287@lsuc.UUCP>
--
---------
Bill McLean @ Ont. Ministry of Health
{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!isis
Re: These newsgroups are proposed for deletion
Author: Laura Creighton
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 1985 01:53
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 1985 01:53
6 lines
764 bytes
764 bytes
Nuke the groups. The idea is to post to net.micro or net.singles with a DISTRIBUTION of ``ont''. The ont groups were a good idea when there was no distribution feature, but those days are long past... Laura Creighton utzoo!laura
Re: These newsgroups are proposed for deletion
Author: Alex Nishri
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 1985 07:09
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 1985 07:09
10 lines
1073 bytes
1073 bytes
I subscribe to ont.micro but not to net.micro. I just don't have time to read all the articles in net.micro, but I am interested in what people locally have to say about micros. The fact that articles are infrequent in ont.micro means I stay subscribed to it. As I understand "Distribution", it will require me to read net.micro in order to get the same information I get in ont.micro. (If I am wrong correct me.) I vote for keeping ont.micro.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads