Re: attcan down?

Article View: ont.uucp

Article #100

#100

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1989 22:28

18 lines
1127 bytes

In article <1989Nov13.190909.24564@nebulus> root@nebulus (Dennis S. Breckenridge) writes:
>Typical!
>
>We should investigate the possibility of taking duplicate feeds for
>the Toronto Area for this type of problem. Maybe UUNET.NORTH should 
>become a reality!

Then what happens when it goes down?

We actually do have considerable redundancy in the central part of the
feed topology, including multiple feeds into the Toronto area, but
inevitably this redundancy doesn't extend all the way to the leaves.

It could be lots worse.  There was a time when if utzoo was down, the
entire Toronto-area Usenet was pretty much completely down.
-- 
A bit of tolerance is worth a  |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
megabyte of flaming.           | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1989Nov14.222833.29408@utzoo.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <1989Nov13.143122.26604@telly.on.ca> <1989Nov13.190909.24564@nebulus>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: ont.uucp
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: attcan down?
Message-ID: <1989Nov14.222833.29408@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
References: <1989Nov13.143122.26604@telly.on.ca> <1989Nov13.190909.24564@nebulus>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 89 22:28:33 GMT

Reply to Parent Message