Thread View: ont.uucp
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by Ian Evans
Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:31
Problems connecting USR Dual v32bis to Worldblazer
Author: Ian Evans
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:31
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 15:31
14 lines
994 bytes
994 bytes
Is anyone out there successfully logging their v32bis
system into a Worldblazer feed site?
On the advice of many I have increased the S7, S9 & S10 registers,
but uucico still fails to get a CONNECT.
From looking at my logs, both sites successfully call me. I can
succeed logging in to my main feed the majority of the time but
have yet to successfuly log in to my mail feed.
If anyone out there has a successful init string for this, I'd
appreciate it.
Re: Problems connecting USR Dual v32bis to Worldblazer
Author: Marc Fournier - Sys Admin
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 03:28
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 03:28
22 lines
1359 bytes
1359 bytes
In article <253.1004.uupcb@bville.gts.org> ian.evans@bville.gts.org (Ian Evans) writes: > >From looking at my logs, both sites successfully call me. I can >succeed logging in to my main feed the majority of the time but >have yet to successfuly log in to my mail feed. > >If anyone out there has a successful init string for this, I'd >appreciate it. > Hmmmm...if you are successful with one, but not the other, maybe the one you cannot connect to has a setting problem and not you? Just a thought Marc -- Marc G. Fournier | R-node Public Access Unix running UnixBBS 1.03 Etobicoke, Ontario | 416-249-5366 24hrs 7 days/week network email voice: 249-4230 | shell/feed accounts available 1800+ newsgroups marc@r-node.gts.org | Telebit T3000/SupraModem2400/Cardinal 2400 FREE
Re: Problems connecting USR Dual v32bis to Worldblazer
Author: Brian Campbell
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 13:43
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 13:43
7 lines
784 bytes
784 bytes
In article <253.1004.uupcb@bville.gts.org> ian.evans@bville.gts.org (Ian Evans) writes: >Is anyone out there successfully logging their v32bis >system into a Worldblazer feed site? We do. I think the key is to set S92=1 and follow the suggestion in the manual with regard to setting S7=60. Also, if a site wants a PEP connect they should set S50=255 before dialing.
Re: Problems connecting USR Dual v32bis to Worldblazer
Author: Geoffrey Welsh
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 01:37
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 01:37
10 lines
824 bytes
824 bytes
ian.evans@bville.gts.org (Ian Evans) writes: > Is anyone out there successfully logging their v32bis > system into a Worldblazer feed site? I understand that USR has released a formware upgrade for their small-box Courier high speed modems. I do not know what improvements are included. Geoffrey Welsh, 7 Strath Humber Court, Islington, Ontario, M9A 4C8 Canada geoff@zswamp.uucp, [xenitec.on.ca|m2xenix.psg.com]!zswamp!geoff (416)258-8467
Re: Problems connecting USR Dual v32bis to Worldblazer
Author: Chris Lewis
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:14
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1992 17:14
10 lines
864 bytes
864 bytes
>ian.evans@bville.gts.org (Ian Evans) writes: > Is anyone out there successfully logging their v32bis > system into a Worldblazer feed site? I don't seem to have any trouble with WorldBlazers with V.32bis/V.42bis. -- Chris Lewis; clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca; Phone: Canada 613 832-0541 Psroff 3.0 info: psroff-request@ferret.ocunix.on.ca Ferret list: ferret-request@ferret.ocunix.on.ca
Re: Problems connecting USR Dual v32bis to Worldblazer
Author: Bruce Becker
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 1992 01:30
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 1992 01:30
28 lines
1571 bytes
1571 bytes
In article <gtmmbah@quantum.on.ca> brianc@quantum.on.ca (Brian Campbell) writes: |In article <253.1004.uupcb@bville.gts.org> ian.evans@bville.gts.org (Ian Evans) writes: |>Is anyone out there successfully logging their v32bis |>system into a Worldblazer feed site? | |We do. I think the key is to set S92=1 and follow the suggestion in |the manual with regard to setting S7=60. Also, if a site wants a PEP |connect they should set S50=255 before dialing. This information applies to Telebit modems, and basically suggests that the Telebit offers PEP tones last in the answer sequence. This requires that calling PEP modems be configured to wait for the PEP tones or else they'd end up connecting at the highest non-PEP speed (2400 bps for non-V.32 versions). This is not a trivial thing to arrange when one has a large number of existing PEP connections... -- ,u, Bruce Becker Toronto, Ontario a /i/ Internet: bdb@becker.gts.org Uucp: ...!web!becker!bdb `\o\-e "The word 'AT&T' is made up of letters, which are the _< /_ intellectual property of Vanna White" - A. Coopersmith
Re: Problems connecting USR Dual v32bis to Worldblazer
Author: Marc Fournier - Sys Admin
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 1992 04:12
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 1992 04:12
24 lines
1584 bytes
1584 bytes
In article <3661@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca> clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) writes: >>ian.evans@bville.gts.org (Ian Evans) writes: > >> Is anyone out there successfully logging their v32bis >> system into a Worldblazer feed site? > >I don't seem to have any trouble with WorldBlazers with V.32bis/V.42bis. Well, I think we can gather from all this that normal v.32bis/v.42bis modems connect no problem to Worldblazers. And, as seen by the fact that Ian's v.32bis *can* successfully connect to my Worldblazer at High Speed, I think maybe we can safely conclude that this is something different between mine and the *other* parties modem settings? And maybe this problem should not have reached out to the net and instead been talked about to the parties involved? Just my opinion...we welcome yours! Marc -- Marc G. Fournier | R-node Public Access Unix running UnixBBS 1.03 Etobicoke, Ontario | 416-249-5366 24hrs 7 days/week network email voice: 249-4230 | shell/feed accounts available 1800+ newsgroups marc@r-node.gts.org | Telebit T3000/SupraModem2400/Cardinal 2400 FREE
Re: Problems connecting USR Dual v32bis to Worldblazer
Author: Dave Martindale
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 03:29
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 03:29
30 lines
1652 bytes
1652 bytes
bdb@becker.GTS.ORG (Bruce Becker) writes: > > This information applies to Telebit modems, > and basically suggests that the Telebit offers > PEP tones last in the answer sequence. This > requires that calling PEP modems be configured > to wait for the PEP tones or else they'd end > up connecting at the highest non-PEP speed > (2400 bps for non-V.32 versions). > > > This is not a trivial thing to arrange when one > has a large number of existing PEP connections... You'd think so. I recently changed my T2500 to offer PEP tones last due to problems in making V.32 connections after the T2500's firmware was upgraded (details in comp.dcom.modems). I sent out a message to all of my neighbours saying "anyone have problems setting s50=255 before calling imax?" It turns out that most neighbours were already doing this as a matter of course for all PEP connections - it was in their standard Dialers (or equivalent) entry. One wasn't doing it, but didn't think it would be a problem. So it wasn't as bad as you might expect. Maybe it's worth polling your neighbours and seeing who would have problems if you offered PEP tones last. Dave
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads