🚀 go-pugleaf

Papa Jack (papajack@express-news.net) wrote:
: This is a typical Pro-Abortion Righter's (PAR's) ploy.  Arbitrarily
: setting up conditions, allows Screamer to eliminate all men and all
: women who have not actually gone into a PP and asked for counseling/
: choices/alternatives.  That's a small group who is very likely to
: defensively protect PP -- anything else would be criticizing themselves.

	Now this makes me wonder why the people who have gone to Planned
Paranthood so readily defend it as you have stated? Could it be that these
people who actually have gone to Planed Paranthood and have found out their
purpose and policy actually approve of and this policy and purpose? 
 
: Wonder how Screamer would react if I told her the same sort of thing 
: after she criticized a man's words/actions?  "Well, you just can't
: comment, Screamer, unless you've been a male and be subjected to male
: harmones and pressures of society."  I'm sure she'd go along with 
: that -- yeah, sure she would.

	I'm quite sure that you would agree that first hand information is
much more valid than second hand information. Do you disagree?

: As noted above, you try to set up conditions where you would only
: have PP judged by females who have actually used their services.
: Those females who have used their services and hate them tend to be
: quiet because of the shame and other strong emotions they arouse.
: So, guess what, no one but the "friendlies" are allowed to comment.
: It's nice work if you can get it.

	And you so quibly speak for all these people? Quote your sources or
shut up. Quote the interviews.

: PP is a chop shop with pretensions.  Their business is killing
: unborn babies.

	PJ is a child molester. I have just as much proof of this has he has
to the above statement.


						-Walter Hansen