🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: Who's The Dummy--Resurrected; Was The Miracle of Simplicity

jarp@ix.netcom.com (Rick Larson ) wrote:


>In <51a7dh$sd4@prometheus.acsu.buffalo.edu> stoltz@acsu.buffalo.edu
>(Steven M. Stoltz) writes: 
>>
>>arkent@cdsnet.net (Raymond Karczewski) writes:
>>
>>
>>> This telepathic merging with the spirit of the word is how all who
>>>survive the coming political/spiritual crisis will communicate in the
>>>future.  

>>>Those who are unable to see beyond their present limitations
>>>will act through passions fraught with  frustration and anger, fueled
>>>by the urgings of  their leadership to destroy all others who do not
>>>share their parochial mindset.  It will be this double-edged sword
>>>(their hopeless duality) that cuts both ways which will destroy them.
>>>The meek, the balanced, the intelligent will be all who are left to
>>>inherit the earth.  
>>
>>A world filled with meek people.  What a paradise !  


>Lets see. A paradise of meek people.  How does Websters dictionary
>define meek?  "humbly submissive, too mild, lacking spirit." 
>Apparently the "Spirit of the Word" is imtimidated by a bunch of
>passiontly sentient, stubbornly independent beings like us.

>There are always people of your mindset that wish to lure the
>frightened elements of the masses to believe that by submitting to some
>higher force, and dissavowing their own power, that they will be
>protected from the uncertainty of human evolution--safe from the storm
>of the incredible changing we are undergoing.

>The duality that destroys belongs to you.  Tou cannot have balance and
>harmony by following the principles of selflessness.  Everything good
>mudt come from an individuals soul (self).  They must exist.  Even
>though we may sometimes hold passionatly to our faults and limitations,
>we have the right to grow and evolve, without shame, for we are
>glorious.  As for your SPIRIT... he (she, it, they) need to get a life.

Rick,
        Clearly, by your reliance upon dictionary definitions, you are
a "letter of the word" man and are unable to transcend that
limitation. I ask you to look at the spirit of your words. You are
proselytizing violence as a solution to surviving in an already
established violent world.

       Your reliance upon the impotence of the "letter" of  words has
left you with an incomplete grasp of what has been communicated. Your
fragmented conclusion has prevented you from engaging in holistic
understanding. 

        Look at the double bind you have put yourself in.  You're
damned if you do and damned if you don't.  Is your solution to put on
a deceptive mask of civility to face the world, while inwardly you are
seething with anger and fear?  That's already being done, for isn't
that how the world of civilized man functions?

       Your approach to peace would seem to support the present inane
momentum of hypocrisy found in images such as deceptive diplomats who
put forth a highly-honed image of wanting peace (through artful
misdirection with their persuasive use of flowery, positive imaged
words) while knowing all the while that behind the scenes intriguing
machinery has already been set into motion  to carry out secret plans
to  invade, plunder, rape, and pillage others for the sake of profit
and power.     SOME PEACE ! !

Raymond Karczewski  http://www.cdsnet.net/Business/Ark/