🚀 go-pugleaf

On 10/25/2012 11:20 AM, catpandaddy wrote:
>
> "Michael Stemper" <mstemper@walkabout.empros.com> wrote in message
> news:k6br1r$cqi$1@dont-email.me...
>> In article <k6bmfb$ign$1@dont-email.me>, el Dorado <siete@ciudads.oro>
>> writes:
>>> On 10/25/2012 6:21 AM, catpandaddy wrote:
>>>> "el Dorado" <siete@ciudads.oro> wrote in message
>>>> news:k6ag5s$ms6$2@dont-email.me...
>>>>> On 10/24/2012 8:08 PM, catpandaddy wrote:
>>>>>> "el Dorado" <siete@ciudads.oro> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:k693f7$qpk$2@dont-email.me...
>>
>>>>>>>>>> politics-specific newsgroups. Buh-bye now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who do we blame for this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> YOU. For not choosing proper newsgroups for your political
>>>>>>>> tripeshow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which newsgroup is improper for discussion on the direction this
>>>>>>> entire nation is about to take?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the groups that lack "politics" in the newsgroup hierarchy name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, the petty syntax vagaries of un-moderated uselessnet groups
>>>>> worry me far less than the looming Obama-led bankruptcy of this
>>>>> nation.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You're welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not the intruding spammer here.
>>>
>>> I'm not terribly taken by your plaintive whining.
>>
>> Pissing off your intended audience isn't generally a good way to get
>> them to listen to you. Just sayin'
>>
>>>> and, as you must know, the outsider does not determine whether the
>>>> regulars
>>>> are welcome to the group.
>>>
>>> What pray tell need I do to be 'welcome' in a _public_ non-moderate
>>> forum?
>>
>> There are two options:
>> 1. Only post when you want to say something relevant to the subject
>> of the group.
>> 2. Light yourself on fire and die in great agony.
>>
>> (I don't know the norms of the Oregon, Colorado, Nebraska or Florida
>> groups. I'm only making this suggestion on behalf of the Minnesota
>> group.)
>>
>> --
>> Michael F. Stemper
>
> Exactly right.
>
You two lovers fire up some Rush albums and snuggle in for the long cold 
winter ahead...