🚀 go-pugleaf

"Legalbest" <legalbest@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20020527101859.18051.00001022@mb-cu.aol.com...

> Trial consultant, Ken Pangborn feels that he has good reason to post the
lies
> and harassment that he did in his preceeding post. Call that reason
PROFIT.
> Oregon fathers should be aware that he pushes use of the Bricklin
Perceptual
> Scales in psychological testing for custody disputes.  There is more to
this
> test than you are being told by Mr. Pangborn.

    You are the one touting those tests Stacy. Of course you have been
challenged to name ANYTHING better or even their equal. Thus far you quote
some very obscure Canadian Psychologist who wrote an op-ed piece in an
insignificant Canadian Bar Journal. You continue to harp on the Bricklin
Testing and ASPECT even though those are NOT the tests the A-Team uses and
you know that. Making a big deal out of them, MS. ALEXANDER is the best card
you have to play. But you seem to keep forgetting that the A-Team cases are
almost exclusively cases of sex crimes not child custody cases. If you would
care to show me where either the Bricklin or the ASPECT cases have any
relevance to a rape case or a child sexual abuse case, or a false domestic
violence case I would enjoy seeing your efforts in that regard. You are a
bitter and silly old dysfunctional old feminist hag. You have been at your
war with me now for 6 years. Why? profit? No! What is YOUR motivation?
Seeing men inflicted as much pain as possible and their children as well.
Your personal track record in that regard with your several ex-husbands and
their children is remarkable. No wonder you have to hide who you really are.
You are such a disgusting vile person in your own life. At least according
to your own children.

    Stacy, your past record of "male impersonations" can be found in several
of your previous incarnations. AT one time you vehemently claimed to be a
man named "Steve" until a ISP's postmaster outed you publicly on soc.men as
STACY ALEXANDER (now a resident of Portland, Oregon). Again as "Hank" you
have been outed as who you really are. But again given your history on the
net, you are at least astute enough to realize that as yourself you have
absolutely NO credibility and you must adopt these false male identities to
try to make your claims against me.

    Why do you  make them? Well because you know that the A-Team has had a
significant impact derailing the feminist anti-father and anti-male agenda
with false allegations.- You know that in these cases we have helped many
thousands of dads win custody. Not from custody cases as such Stacy, not
using Bricklin or ASPECT, but because the mothers who make false allegations
are proving themselves to be unfit to have custody. And as a man hater you
just can't tolerate our success rate. (well over 95%)

    Now Stacy as you try to "WARN" dads about me, what is hilarious is that
the father's group in Oregon rates us as one of their top referral sources.
Why? Because we have consistently won in Oregon for men! And YOU can't have
that, can you? People can look at the DADS website and see for themselves.
What is funny is that you used over a dozen different father's rights groups
URLs to support your claims against me. It is funny because all but one of
them listed ME as their main referral source.

    Now let's go back to some of your more amusing claims about me. Such as
your claim last year that you had in your "possession" police reports about
me that supported your claim of my having an arrest history for sex crimes.
Of course, being the idiot that you are, you pretending to be an ATTORNEY
from Tampa, Florida (who doesn't exist) and later just a "legal hobbyist"
who freely gives legal advice to people (that is almost always BAD) you
seemed to forget that Florida is a state where those convicted of sex crimes
are listed on the state's website for sex offenders. Funny that my name
isn't on it. But as you made your claims you claimed to have "official
police reports" in your hands that verified my many convictions. And then
you got even funnier as you congratulated the work of the very fine Palm
Harbor Police Department. A police agency, Stacy, that you came to know
hasn't existed on almost 70 years. When exposed that there was no PH Police,
you then claimed that Palm Harbor was patrolled by the Clearwater Police
Department. Wrong again. See Stacy your SCAM of claiming to be from Florida
when you arte a nut case ridden out of Oklahoma, Louisiana, Texas, and
Massachusetts, you now live with your half baked girls school professor
hubby in Portland. And you try to sell your insanity world wide. Is Portland
happy to have a nut like you to call its very own? Well, Oregon has many
great people, but it also is home to many wierdos as well. Stacy your claims
about the Palm Harbor PD is almost as funny as your claims several years ago
on Milwaukee General of the many close relatives you had living in the
non-existent suburb of "East Allis."  Your problem Stacy is that you make
these flubs when you can't find the info on your search engines.

    You are so easy to play with and watch you misidentify things in the
places you claim to live in or have family in to give you all this secret
inside knowledge. The non-existent electronic billboards outside the
football stadium in Tampa. The misidentification of the stadium across the
street and hilarious misidentification of what team played in that stadium.
Not knowing the major streets. So many incorrect identifications that anyone
who lived where you claimed would know. Not knowing major personalities in
the area. Claiming that a local TV personality was at one station when they
hadn't been at that station for nearly a decade. Stacy your lies are on a
level to dwarf Mt. Everest!  You are a hopeless nut case.

    I see you want to drag poor Mr. Lueck into this. I have no problems with
his walking into the public shredder if he so chooses. I think I have
answered all his claims pretty effectively. Remember his main claim was that
the kind of work we were going to do could not be used in Oregon, so he was
told by an alleged (unnamed) former client. Yet, Stacy, the FACT exists that
we HAVE used that material repeatedly in Oregon even recently.

    Now Stacy, even though I am frequently in Oregon on cases (that we win
almost as a matter of routine) You will never know when I am there. People
familiar with you from other forums will recall your frantic calls to
Massachusetts police when you thought I was there. (Actually I was in Las
Vegas with my wife and daughter.)  As you frantically accused me of being
outside your home "right now and he has a gun, please hurry!"  Oh the 911
tape is hilarious Stacy! Police in several states have your written off as a
complete nut. Don't worry, Stacy, I will never knowingly be within 5 miles
of you. And also assume that whatever information you get about where I am
is incorrect. I will make sure that when you think I am somewhere in
Oregon, I am actually at the other side of the country.   Just so we can
have another amusing police report and two detectives rolling on the floor
laughing at you again! Stacy I have NO idea WHY you would think I ever would
have anywhere near the interest in you that you have in me. I don't share
your level of insanity or that of the other members of your little
"coalition" of nut cases.