Thread View: or.general
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by digishit
Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:07
Why would you make this stupid mistake?
Author: digishit
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:07
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:07
397 lines
15389 bytes
15389 bytes
brian whatcott <betw...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Ron Lee from Meadow Lake Airport wrote in Pike's Peak Flyer: January 2009 The SuperUnicom was shut down in early August 2008 due to harmful interference on the 122.7 MHz fre-quency A grant was submitted and approved to get an AWOS III P/T using FAA funds. Our portion of the cost is around $4,000 although incidentals may drive it higher... but far below the $25,000 previously budgeted for an AWOS. One MLAA Board member is attempting to force a system that is not fully certified down our throats using the flawed rationale that it is cheaper that the fully certified systems offered by All Weather Inc and Vaisala. A major down side to the Belfort system is that pilots will not be able to access METAR data through FlightService, ADDS, on their on-board weather systems, etc. We will very likely be unable to acquire a three letter airport ID and maintenance will cost much more over its lifetime than with either of the fully certified systems. Plus in its current implementation, there is no obvious upgrade path to getting present weather and lightning information available in an AWOS III P/T system. It is crucial to the safety of this airport and our usefulness as a destination airport within the National Airspace System that we get a state of the art AWOS. With the FAA grant, it is amazingly affordable. But it is essential that local pilots become informed on this matter and contact all Board members to express their view. My opinion... based upon extensive research on behalf of MLAA members... is that we need a fully certified AWOS. The minimum configuration is AWOS III, with AWOS III P/T highly desirable (objective). It needs to be the number one priority acquisition with a target installation not later than Spring 2009. It must not be sacrificed to pay interest on the land acquisition. His full report is located he http://home.pcisys.net/~ronlee/MeadowLakeAWOSSelectionAnalysis.doc If you're considering Digiwx AWOS... READ THIS ANALYSIS FIRST! Following up on the post regarding the UN-APPROVED, UN- CERTIFIED and UN-OFFICIAL weather data sprewed by Belfort Digiwx AWOS, one also needs to note that they only sold 2 units during all of 2009. Buy anything except Belfort Instrument Digiwx AWOS from Bruce R. Robinson and company. These Belfort Digiwx AWOS Chinese made wind sensors are about the worst products available in the weather instrumentation marketplace worldwide. This is yet another reason why Belfort Instruments did not get the following Digiwx AWOS weather sensors (ie. wind speed, wind direction, temperature, dewpoint, relative humidity, density altitude, present weather, precipitation, lightning, ceilometer (aka condensation altitude)) FAA Approved, nor FAA Ceritified and why the information SPEWED from a Belfort Digiwx AWOS is NOT OFFICIAL FAA WEATHER INFORMATION (like you'd find in a FAA METAR report). Belfort formats their UN-APPROVED, UN-CERTIFIED and UN-OFFICIAL weather data to make it look like an official avaition METAR when it's NOT! And that's why you won't find a single FAA COMMISSIONED Belfort Digiwx AWOS anywhere in the world! Bruce R. Robinson's 10 reasons to NOT buy Belfort Digiwx AWOS Ten reasons for not buying Belfort Instrument Digiwx AWOS: 1) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed wind speed 2) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed wind direction 3) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed temperature 4) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed dewpoint 5) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed density altitude 6) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed visibility 7) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed precipitation measurement 8) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed precipitation discriminator 9) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed ceiling measurement (ceilometer) 10) no FAA Approved or FAA Certifed lightning detection Then you can always check out the reliability of a Digiwx: Check it out yourself: http://www.digiwx-n27.com - CURRENT DATA NOT AVAILABLE http://www.digiwx-2m8.com - CURRENT DATA NOT AVAILABLE http://www.digiwx-ambergriscayairport.com - CURRENT DATA NOT AVAILABLE It's been this way for months! Not hours, not days, not weeks, but months! How many more examples of unreliable Digiwx stations do you need? The United States had 546 commercial service airports as of 2001. See: http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/20.. You won't find a single Digiwx AWOS in use at any of these commercial service airports where passengers are being transported. When you consider that Digiwx AWOS is nothing more than a FAA Approved barometer and visibility sensor, now you know why! Why would you put your family at risk to a small airport that has a Digiwx AWOS in use? Do you have a death wish for your family? Here are some other relaible AWOS alternatives that you will find in use at U.S. commercial service airports including: http://www.vaisala.com http://www.allweatherinc.com http://www.superunicom.com Belfort Instrument Digiwx AWOS LOWLIFES BELFORT & GAMMA SCIENTIFIC CO-OWNER Bruce R. Robinson (serves as Chief PHUCK at Utilipoint Intl) Ellen H. Robinson (phuck buddy) 60 Paako Drive Sandia Park, NM 87047 brobinson (at) utilipoint.com http://www.utilipoint.com/team/robinson.asp BELFORT & GAMMA SCIENTIFIC CO-OWNER Nicholas C. Kaufman Darlene C. Kaufman (phuck buddy) 13667 Marsh Harbor Drive North Jacksonville, FL 32225 cs (at) quickstrategy.com http://www.quickstrategy.com/advisors.jsp CHIEF OPERATING BITCH Debra S. Alascio (maiden name: Spence) Santo V. Alascio (drunk husband) 960 Fell Street, Unit 313 Baltimore, MD 21231 DSAlascio (at) belfortinstrument.com FORMER BELFORT CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (who was fired) William C. Gordon (backstabbing dick sucker) Judith A. Gordon (phuck buddy) 13911 Manor Road Baldwin, MD 21013 BELFORT DIRECTOR OF SALES Ralph F. Petragnani Elisa Petragnani (phuck buddy) 1039 Old Bay Ridge Road Annapolis, MD 21403-4256 rpetragnani (at) belfortinstrument.com BELFORT INSTRUMENT DIGIWX AWOS SUPPORT M. Tylor Burton III Jane M. Burton (phuck buddy) 25 Dunvegan Road Catonsville, MD 21228 tylorb (at) gmail.com BELFORT INSTRUMENT MARKETING MANAGER Steven K. Eagan Joy M. Eagan (phuck buddy) 18912 Falls Road Hampstead, MD 21074 Digiwx AWOS was voted the MOST UNRELIABLE AWOS weather system in the U.S. marketplace according to a recent poll of pilots from AOPA. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.airports/msg/2de1905c0cdcc7a3 Pilots reported that: 1) Digiwx unable to consistently transmit weather data 2) rampant Digiwx outages (that pretty scary) 3) incorrect wind direction and wind speed readings 4) incorrect temperature and dewpoint readings 5) Digiwx AWOS systems that aren't even FAA commissioned 6) non-existant tech support from Belfort Instruments 7) Digiwx that doesn't broadcast over Unicom using mic clicks 8) Digiwx that doesn't broadcast over Unicom using voice reco 9) several airports that have replaced Digiwx with SuperAWOS 10) Belfort Instruments lies about it's involvement with Wright Brothers And one commercial pilot offered up these indisputable facts: Belfort Instruments ancient ceilometer is being retired. http://www.arm.gov/instruments/instrument.php?id=blc Belfort Instruments unreliable ASOS wind anemometer is being replaced. http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/69268.pdf Belfort Instruments faulty Universal 5-780 rain gage is being retired. http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wrir034167/toc.html Belfort Instruments problem-prone Bendix Aerovane is being replaced. http://ice.ssec.wisc.edu/databook/dtbk95.doc Belfort Instrument Type F Naval wind system being phased out. http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2002/04/01/story.. ml Belfort Instruments Model 6000 visibility sensor will no longer be a part of the U.S. Air Force's OS-21/FSB program come early 2007. About Belfort Instrument Company: Belfort used to be a leading provider of weather instruments to the government, professional meteorology and aviation markets. Key words: "use to be." They never provided any wind sensors to the Wright Brothers despite their fantastic assertion that they did! Historical archives available at the U.S. Air Force National Museum (1100 Spaatz Street, Wright- Patterson AFB, OH 45433) tells a very different story and specifically mentions a "Richards" anemometer which Wilbur Wright held as pictured at: "http://wings.avkids.com/Book/Wright/history1_19012.html". The Belfort aerovane wind system on U.S. Naval aircraft carriers are currently being replaced with ultrasonic wind sensors from QPI (11207 Single Oak Road, Fredericksburg, VA 22407) which just won a $94 million dollar contract for the Moriah Wind System. Belfort wind speed and direction anemometers found on the ASOS platform are now being replaced with ultrasonic sensors from the Vaisala Group. Belfort Instruments Model 6000 visibility sensor will no longer be a part of the U.S. Air Force's OS-21/FSB program come early 2007. And despite a $500,000 U.S. government grant from NASA's Small Aircraft Transportation System (SATS) program in 2004 to build a low-cost ceilometer, Belfort didn't possess the technical smarts nor the engineering know-how to accomplish the task. So now they're importing the Eliasson CBME 80A laser ceilometer from Muir Matheson. As one can readily see, Belfort is no longer setting any standards of measurement in the weather instrumentation world. And now Belfort is propagating lie after lie about their fabled company history while trying to steal thunder from the accomplishments of the Wright Brothers. According to the National Museum of American History (12th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20560), Belfort founder Julian Friez never made it to Baltimore to set up shop until sometime in the 1890s even though Belfort officials fradulently claim the company was founded in 1876. Thus, there was no 125th anniversary for Belfort to celebrate in 2001 even though they hosted a party to which no one came! Belfort's proclamation that it is the "Oldest Weather Company in the World" is simply yet another Belfort lie as Thomas Romney Robinson invented the first wind anemometer in 1846, six years before Julian Friez was born in 1852. Belfort doesn't even know it's own company history so they just make it up! You should wonder what other crap (eg. Digiwx AWOS) they also make up! For more information about Belfort Instrument and DigiWx, visit dogsh*t.com Belfort Instrument Company does business under several names including Gamma Scientific, UDT Instruments, Advanced Retro and Road Vista. ROTFLMAO..... Tom Cryar <tcr...@higherplane.org> wrote: Here we go again, the Belfort Instrument Company Digiwx Awos NUMB-NUTS (Bruce R. Robinson and former "hired & fired" president John S. Hoover) are at it again. They can't get their "crap research" peer-reviewed nor accepted by any professional meteorological publications, so now they just post their bull-shit on the company blogspot. The latest toilet turd is titled: Reproducing Precipitation Gauge Inconsistencies Using Modern Wind Deflection Methodologies. It this latest dump (as in toilet dump) of Belfort propaganda, Robinson Crusoe and Hoover Vacuum cleaners propose the construction of tapered metal wind deflectors (e.g. Alter Shield) around a precipiation gauge to reduce collection errors. Note: If Belfort Instruments is producing anything, it will be full of errors! Quoting: "In 2008 Belfort Instrument Company started testing a new metal double alter shield that would be easier to install, self cleaning, quiet and as effective as the US Climate Reference Network standard SDFIR." Have you seen this ringed metal donut that Belfort proposes? Easy to install --- hardly; doesn't it require a concrete foundation? Self cleaning --- can I piss on it? Quiet --- what is quiet about metal deflectors clanking away when the wind blows (that's almost like saying a tree doesn't make a sound when it falls in the woods unless somebody is around to hear it). Effective --- now that's a real Belfort streeeeeeeeeetch! They didn't make mention of quality --- as in "rusted" quality the day after the Belfort warranty expires! Quoting: "Based on these preliminary test results and subsequent field studies it is apparent that the use of either the SDFIR or the Belfort Double Alter shield significantly reduces the differences in snow catchment efficiency between gauges having different geometries and inlet diameters at wind velocities over 5 m/s." It is "apparent" --- it's apparent that the numb-nut authors didn't use any statistics to validate their feeble observations --- they just jumped to unfound conclusions in publishing their poppycock! Catchment --- Belfort's authors need to check their drawers for some CATCHMENT --- I'll bet they'll find plenty of Digi-SHIT down there! Neither one of these two buffoons are trained researchers. They don't know the first thing about the scientific method or designing a research study. Like all things at Belfort, somebody drew out the initial plans on a used piece of toilet paper. And then they run to patent office claiming some uniqueness. What the hell is unique about this Belfort metal condom that supposedly protects a rain gauge? Just more smoke and mirrors from a "nobody" and "wannabe" in the meteorological instrumentation marketplace. Just say I'll pass on this latest load of Belfort Instruments BULL-SHIT and save yourself the grief! And a word ot two about our sponsor: Tom Cryar - the man who pilfered Stanwyck Avionics' ASOS/AWOS display interface for use in Belfort Instruments Digiwx Advisor software program which Bruce R. Robinson is now fronting with his Digiwx AWOS product junk offering. Tom Cryar PO Box 3635 Edgewood, NM 87015 505-286-5424 tcryar (at) higherplane.org Tom lives right around the corner from: Bruce R. Robinson 60 Paako Drive Sandia Park, NM 87047 brobinson (at) utilipoint.com
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads