🚀 go-pugleaf

*** post for FREE via your newsreader at post.newsfeed.com ***

Re:  "MR. BUSH, TEAR DOWN THAT STONE WALL OF SILENCE"

"lastassasin" (COSTRUM1@cfl.rr.com) wrote: 

                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

01/29/02 11:26:28 whois COSTRUM1@cfl.rr.com 

Registrant: Road Runner HoldCo, LLC (RR6-DOM) 

13241 Woodland Park Rd 

Herndon, VA 20171 US 

703-345-3416 Fax- 703-345-251 

                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:44:19 GMT 

la: > The freedom of speech, in correlation to the right of the citizen
to possess a document free from ceizure, is nullified, when the said
document becomes a part of the public domain (the internet). You, in
doing so, have made your words public domain, and they are open to
censorship. If the public feels that the document is a representation of
their freedom of speech, then the government's censorship is violating
the freedom of speech. 

rk: In other words, If there is a ghost of a chance to clean out
Internet newsgroups of the present infestation of mind
controller/disinformation agent provocateurs who dominate these groups
with repeatable/predictable, anonymous libelous attacks, inanity, gossip
and carefully spun misdirections, the Internet using public must first
WAKE UP to the Government's agenda to undermine their collective RIGHT
TO FREE SPEECH and then overcome their already established conditioned
inertia to sign the petition at:
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/RayNita1/petition.html 

rk: Isn't that what I have been saying all along? 

la: > The same would apply to media, of any form. The difficulty is in
determining if the document is your idea, or the public's. 

rk: Ah!, Idea vs Idea, eh? My idea vs. the public's idea? How
dualistically "divide and conquer/isolationist" of you! Where does
nondualistic TRUTH exist in this legalistic meandering dissertation of
yours? 

la: > Petitioning, in this case, would need a group of  petitioners to
imply the public. You are accusing the government of violating the
freedom of speech. 

rk: I am accusing government/media sponsored/supported mind
control/disinformations agents who, having failed at openly discrediting
me over a SEVEN YEAR PERIOD on the newsgroups/forums, must now resort to
*behind the scenes* technical "dirty tricks" to prevent my writing from
reaching an hypnotically entranced, conditioned PUBLIC. Are we tracking
on this so far? 

la: > The government becomes an entity, with the right to be found
guilty in a court of law. 

rk: Who controls the courts? Who possesses unlimited resources
coercively extracted from the masses? Did you say Government? Is that
what you mean by JUSTICE? 

rk: Shakespeare had the right "idea" about how to deal with lawyers. Get
rid of such a "blight" upon humanity. However he failed to learn the
lesson of Christ and the Moneychangers (Bankers) in the Temple. 

rk: In understanding those two fundamental ruling momentums one, so
enlightened, may see for him/herself the unfoldment of HELL on earth. 

la: > You have to show evidence of the violation, in order to prove
guilt. It becomes a catch-22. 

rk: Like "damned if you do and damned if you don't"? How dualistic of
you!! 

la: > You need evidence, but the government is destroying the evidence. 

rk: Like the fox guarding the hen house, eh? 

rk: Who is there to police the police in such a curious dilemma? Is
anybody waking up to the realization of how they are allowing for the
emergence of their own enslavement yet? 

la: > The only proof you can have is that the government is destroying
evidence, but not the actual evidence. The courts would be able to see
the destruction, but not the actual evidence. 

rk: See what I mean about legalistic word mincers? It is the step
through the "looking glass" into a BASSACKWARD reality where confusion
reigns supreme and JUSTICE is merely an ILLUSION. 

la: > The only thing that would come of it is that the government was
guilty of destroying evidence. This might stop the government from doing
the same in the future. But, the only penalty would be that the
government would have to pay the cost of the destruction. Being a
document, the only cost is producing it, and you could only get extras
for grief and suffering, not much. The guilt would be displaced on the
portion of the government that had destroyed the document. They would
only get a slap on the wrist, and business would continue as usual. The
only memory of it would be a convistion of guilt. But, I am sure there
are plenty of those on the books. It is the same with probabilities, if
you flip a coin, then it can be 50-50 heads, or tails. Each flip is
separate, and still 50-50. The government has a 50-50 chance, changed
with evidence, on any future ruling. Now, if you could show a connected
history of guilt, then you might change things. 

rk: Try SEVEN YEARS of recorded evidence found in the GOOGLE Archives
(formerly DejaNews Archives). It's all there in indisputable black and
white! All government Investigators have to do is to lift the lid off
"Pandora's Box".

la: > But, the government could show that individual censors were not of
related information. You have come to realize how larger governments can
diffuse the individual's rights. 

rk: Is that your token attempt at expressing the simple TRUTH that
"those who make the rules (and possess the money) win the game"? 

la: > It is just the affect of the law of large numbers. I am not sure
that the government is to blame, but the fact that there are 283 million
Americans. This number allows the government to roll-over the indivdual.
But then, power isn't in the individual, but the people combined. 

rk: The solution? Sign the Petition at:
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/RayNita1/petition.html and let freedom
loving Americans join me in GETTING ON WITH TAKING BACK CONTROL OF OUR
COUNTRY!!

                             Raymond Karczewski 
-- 
-- 
***************************************************************
            
              When Christ Speaks ---  Who Listens?
                  Error: posting not allowed.
       MSNBC is currently rejecting posts from your site. 
Ruminations of a Living Christ   http://www.arkenterprises.com

***************************************************************


 -----= Posted via Newsfeed.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeed.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== 90,000 Groups! - 17 Servers! - Unlimited Download! =-----