Article View: ott.forsale.computing
Article #268"A warning to consumers in the OTTAWA area" - Chapter 2
From: J Alexander Norland
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 00:00
61 lines
4321 bytes
4321 bytes
Note: This article may be of no interest to people who are not residents of Ontario, and particularly of Ottawa. In a previous article about OCS, I reported that I was mislead into purchasing a refurbished laptop, believing that I was buying a new unit. I concluded by quoting the court's judgment, which awarded me damages. In this, the second article, I will outline a few points concerning the small claims court of our province. If you ever intend to resort to the small claims court, you may be able to benefit from knowing about my experience. At the back of our mind, we, the people of Ontario, have the notion that our provincial government created the system of small claims courts so that disputes over small sums could be resolved expeditiously, without lawyers and in a relatively informal way. This notion assumes that both sides play by the same rules, using a level playing field. Before you rush to fill out a claim, consider this. At first, I contacted Ms McConkey, president of "1150033 Ontario Inc., carrying on business as Ottawa Computer Services" to settle out of court. Rather than respond, Ms McConkey hired legal counsel, whose contribution was to send me the standard threats, but no offer to speak of. At that point I filed a claim with the court On November 7, 1996. According to the court's staff, OCS should have filed a defence by November 28, a pre-trial hearing could have been heard by mid December, and the trial itself could have been heard in the first week of January. In reality, Ms McConkey hired another lawyer, whose first contribution was to file a "motion", asking the court to dismiss my claim even before the "matters of issue" are heard. I consulted a lawyer who advised me that the motion has no chance of succeeding and who encouraged me to save my money and represent myself. I followed this advice and the "motion" was defeated: the pretrial was on. But OCS succeeded in delaying the proceedings, increasing my expenses, and wasting my time and the court's time. And why not? For OCS this was just one more business expense, which is probably tax deductible; I, on the other hand, would have to pay for my own expenses with after-tax dollars. If you go to small claims court, this may happen to you too. Then came a series of delays, when OCS started missing deadlines, a series too long to report here. But the most egregious delay occurred after both sides had agreed to a trial on March 26. Two weeks before the trial date, the lawyer for OCS advised that "the defendant will not be available for trial". This meant that my witness and myself had to re-organize our schedules and start negotiating a new date. (Incidentally, on the morning of March 26, I spoke with Ms McConkey at her store to find out why she was not "available for trial", but she refused to give me a reason). The end result was that OCS and their lawyer caused the claim to came before a judge in mid-April rather than in the first week of January. If you apply to small claims court, you too may be subject to this type of delay tactics. Once you have won your case, how do you get your money? Well, here starts another procedure, or, rather, a new array of procedures. More about this side, in the next chapter. Suffice it to say, that to date OCS has not paid a penny... I hope you find this info useful: forewarned is forearmed. Tune in for Chapter 3. Cheers.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5jif7n$lgn@freenet-news.carleton.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ff532,bbd4fb784a45fb7f,start X-Google-Attributes: gidff532,public X-Google-Thread: 1107e7,bbd4fb784a45fb7f,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1107e7,public X-Google-Thread: 10ef26,bbd4fb784a45fb7f,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10ef26,public X-Google-Thread: f55c0,bbd4fb784a45fb7f,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf55c0,public From: dt804@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (J Alexander Norland) Subject: "A warning to consumers in the OTTAWA area" - Chapter 2 Date: 1997/04/22 Message-ID: <5jif7n$lgn@freenet-news.carleton.ca> X-Deja-AN: 236597723 X-Given-Sender: dt804@freenet2.carleton.ca (J Alexander Norland) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet Reply-To: dt804@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (J Alexander Norland) Newsgroups: ott.forsale.computing,ont.forsale,can.forsale,comp.misc