Re: NCF? FreeNet or FeeNet

Article View: ott.online

Article #111

#111

From: Howard Eisenberger
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 00:00

21 lines
1286 bytes

In article <37d2b505.1993608@news.newforce.ca>,
Darrell (darrell@newforce.ca) wrote:
>
>But the simple fact
>of the matter is Other ISP's can and do other better services for more
>users with less man-power (person-power?) than NCF, why is that.

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that while thousands of
users think nothing of paying ten times what the NCF is asking to
a commercial provider, they expect the NCF to provide the same
services for free.

>NCF as a business is a failure

Apparently.

Howard E.

-- 
If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem.
-George Carlin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <KHv030znUkoT091yn@freenet.carleton.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <37d2b505.1993608@news.newforce.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,6510667b4e13df38
X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public
X-Google-Thread: 105a5a,6510667b4e13df38
X-Google-Attributes: gid105a5a,public
From: ag221@freenet.carleton.ca (Howard Eisenberger)
Subject: Re: NCF? FreeNet or FeeNet
Date: 1999/09/05
Message-ID: <KHv030znUkoT091yn@freenet.carleton.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 521474002
Sender: ag221@freenet.carleton.ca (Howard Eisenberger)
References: <37d2b505.1993608@news.newforce.ca>
Organization: Gonif Systems and NCF, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
X-AUP: no unsolicited advertising
Reply-To: hce-blue@mail.dotcom.fr
Newsgroups: ott.online,can.infohighway

Reply to Parent Message