Article View: ott.online
Article #21Re: GC URLs (Was Re: *****CHILD**MOLESTER**ALERT*****)
From: Vivien Milat
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 00:00
57 lines
3268 bytes
3268 bytes
Ed Hew wrote: > In article <353FAACD.AD7B2F9@storm.ca>, Vivien Milat <milat@storm.ca> wrote: > >Well. If there weren't stupid rules that ONE organisation can only have > >ONE CDN TLD, > >then we could have www.gov.ca and www.gouv.ca (like there's gouv.fr in > >France). > > Seems you're suggesting that certain "stupid rules" that don't in > fact exist are a problem. Have you actually *read* the rules? > Have you discussed any specific situation with a CA Domain Committee > member to find out how you can obtain any particular subdomain? > Certainly, I don't ever recall having received a query from you. Hmmm.. I thought I had agreed in another post that it was possible to have 2 .ca domains, but anyways. > There *is* provision for a CA subdomain based on the french counterpart > of an organization's name. They can have one any time *they* want one. > Talk to them instead of complaining based on false premises. > > >I really hate the CA Domain committee, if you hadn't noticed. :-( > > I've noticed, but I've also noticed that everything you've written > that I've read tonight doesn't derive from facts. Small problem there. > > >Like, if I wanted to get a virtual domain, I can get vivien.ottawa.on.ca > >(which sucks) > >or vivien.net (70US more to pay). Or can I federally incorporate myself? :-) > >Can I make > >myself have an office in Quebec? :-) > > Perhaps you could support the liberalization of the regulations that > was proposed so that it would not be an issue???? We on the CA Domain > Committee don't think it should be an issue and we would really like > some public support so that it *won't* be an issue. If you do feel as > you write, which basically seems to mirror what we on the existing > CA Domain Committee feel should be implimented, then don't just sit > idly and let the opportunity pass by! > > In the meantime, we are bound by the regulations as they are, as > we are not in a position to change them in any major way until the > new governing body takes control. We can however work with them > productively, as those I've worked with to that end well know. Yes. OK. But tell me, could I ever with the current rules get anything other than vivien.ottawa.on.ca? Vivien -- Vivien Milat vivienm@bigfoot.com - milat@storm.ca - ICQ 4445675 Webmaster, Planet Larisa - http://www.planetlarisa.home.ml.org Vivien's World - http://www.vivienm.home.ml.org Measurement Converter for Windows beta program at http://www.mconv.home.ml.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3543442B.57DC61AD@storm.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bd66db$333627a0$038c4bce@bryan-> <353F2161.B6C97AA1@storm.ca> <6hnsqt$fnb@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <353FAACD.AD7B2F9@storm.ca> <Es0B1s.Irx@xenitec.on.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 105a5a,418c3e877f5346a1 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a5a,public X-Google-Thread: 114bd6,bc4018ae63803402 X-Google-Attributes: gid114bd6,public From: Vivien Milat <milat@storm.ca> Subject: Re: GC URLs (Was Re: *****CHILD**MOLESTER**ALERT*****) Date: 1998/04/26 Message-ID: <3543442B.57DC61AD@storm.ca> X-Deja-AN: 347817087 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <01bd66db$333627a0$038c4bce@bryan-> <353F2161.B6C97AA1@storm.ca> <6hnsqt$fnb@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <353FAACD.AD7B2F9@storm.ca> <Es0B1s.Irx@xenitec.on.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Storm Internet Services Newsgroups: ott.online,can.domain