Article View: ott.online
Article #360MISC> Anti-Spam Law proposed
From: Colin R. Leech
Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 00:00
95 lines
5541 bytes
5541 bytes
Reposted from comp.internet.net-happenings: > From: Edward Cherlin <cherlin@newbie.net> > Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 09:13:19 -0700 > > Anti-Spam Law Proposed > http://www.cauce.org > > Group Says, "Ban Junk Electronic Mail" > > Internet, May 12, 1997--The Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial > E-mail (CAUCE) announced today that it is calling for a legal ban on > unsolicited e-mail advertising. CAUCE has drafted an amendment to the > federal law that bans unsolicited fax advertisements, to extend it to cover > unsolicited e-mail advertising on the same terms. The proposal would give > e-mail users control of the kinds of advertising they are willing to accept > in their mailboxes, whether they prefer to shut it off completely, or ask > for more. > > The junk fax law (more formally, portions of 47 USC 227), provides that > businesses may offer goods and services in fax messages only if the > recipient has asked for the information or has a previous business > relationship with the company. Recipients may ask to be taken off > mailing lists at any time. Violation can result in a civil penalty of $500 > per message, or more in the case of clearly willful violation or failure to > provide a valid return fax number. Extending the same terms to e-mail > should work equally well, according to CAUCE. > > The arguments against junk e-mail and junk fax are very similar. Cost > shifting to the recipient and denial of service are two of the most > important. For example, many e-mail users and mailing lists have a daily > limit on traffic, so UCE can displace other traffic and prevent it > getting through. > > "Starting from an existing law has several important advantages," said > CAUCE co-founder Edward Cherlin. "We have a law that has worked well, > that covers a very similar problem, and that has passed a constitutional > challenge in court. The only thing really wrong with the junk fax law > from our point of view is that so few people know it exists, so junk fax > still continues on a small scale. That makes education the number two > priority for us, behind getting the law passed." > > The CAUCE Web site at http://www.cauce.org is an important part of the > organization's education campaign. It offers information about UCE and > the proposed amendment, a FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) page, and a > sign-up page where visitors can join CAUCE to receive a newsletter on Spam > issues, or register their support for the proposal. Electronic signatures > will be sorted and delivered to the appropriate Senators and Representatives. > > The site also explains why other proposed solutions to UCE don't work, > and how UCE harms other businesses. Because of UCE, many people are > unwilling to deal with any online business. In particular it is impossible > to create anything like a complete Internet e-mail directory service, since > it would be used to generate mailing lists. > > "We're not against commerce on-line. We're just against paying > to receive junk mail. It's time-consuming to deal with, and it's > incredibly costly - a cost which has to be passed on by the > Internet Service Provider (ISP) to their subscribers." said CAUCE member > John Mozena. > > The Coalition Against UCE (Unsolicited Commercial E-mail) was > founded by Scott Hazen Mueller, Vice President for Engineering > for Whole Earth Networks, Edward Cherlin, Vice President for > Business Development of NewbieNet, a free educational service > for novice Internet users, and Doug Muth, a UNIX system > administrator. Legal expertise was provided by Anne Mitchell, > an attorney in Santa Clara, CA with many years' experience > on the Internet. The lobbying effort in Washington is led by Ray > Everett-Church, a contractor with various ISPs on computer > security issues. > > For more information on the Coalition and its lobbying efforts, > visit its Web home page at http://www.cauce.org. The CAUCE Web > site explains the Spam problem, gives the text of the current law > prohibiting junk faxes and the proposed amendment, and answers > common questions about the proposal. > > -- > > Edward Cherlin Help outlaw Spam Everything should be made > Vice President http://www.cauce.org as simple as possible, > NewbieNet, Inc. __but no simpler__. > http://www.newbie.net/ Attributed to Albert Einstein > > -- #### |\^/| Colin R. Leech ag414 or crleech@freenet.carleton.ca #### _|\| |/|_ Civil engineer by training, transport planner by choice. #### > < Opinions are my own. You may consider them shareware. #### >_./|\._< "If you can't return a favour, pass it on." - A.L. Brown
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5m69a6$isb@freenet-news.carleton.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5l9odb$4v7@shocker.gi.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f6dc,3c5ff84de3e9798,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10f6dc,public X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,3c5ff84de3e9798,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public X-Google-Thread: 105a5a,3c5ff84de3e9798,start X-Google-Attributes: gid105a5a,public From: ag414@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Colin R. Leech) Subject: MISC> Anti-Spam Law proposed Date: 1997/05/24 Message-ID: <5m69a6$isb@freenet-news.carleton.ca> X-Deja-AN: 243551656 References: <5l9odb$4v7@shocker.gi.net> X-Given-Sender: ag414@freenet6.carleton.ca (Colin R. Leech) Organization: The National Capital FreeNet Reply-To: ag414@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Colin R. Leech) Newsgroups: ott.online,can.infohighway,uw.general