Article View: ott.online
Article #362Re: MISC> Anti-Spam Law proposed
From: Alan Dekok
Date: Sun, 25 May 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 25 May 1997 00:00
18 lines
1331 bytes
1331 bytes
In article <5m7vri$fbj$1@news.chatlink.com>, The Shadow <shadow01@aracnet.com> wrote: >Instead of supporting such legislation, which will not work, >why doesn't CAUCE get behind the E-Mail filtering services, >which DO WORK, and have been around for a long time now? So you want *me* to pay for other people's idiocy, and subscribe to a commercial anti-spam service? Isn't this exactly the same sort of crap that started UCE in the first place? >If you want to solve all of your UCE problems, go to: [ advertisement snipped ] Thanks for the ad, but I'd rather see idiots pay the price for being idiots, and not see *me* pay the price. Alan DeKok.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5m9k5m$vr8@dragon.achilles.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5l9odb$4v7@shocker.gi.net> <5m69a6$isb@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <5m7vri$fbj$1@news.chatlink.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f6dc,3c5ff84de3e9798 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f6dc,public X-Google-Thread: 105a5a,3c5ff84de3e9798 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a5a,public X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,3c5ff84de3e9798 X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public From: aland@achilles.net (Alan Dekok) Subject: Re: MISC> Anti-Spam Law proposed Date: 1997/05/25 Message-ID: <5m9k5m$vr8@dragon.achilles.net> X-Deja-AN: 243818453 References: <5l9odb$4v7@shocker.gi.net> <5m69a6$isb@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <5m7vri$fbj$1@news.chatlink.com> Organization: Achilles Internet Ltd. Newsgroups: ott.online,can.infohighway,uw.general