Article View: ott.online
Article #373Re: 56K Modems
From: Anthony Hill
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00
65 lines
3532 bytes
3532 bytes
On Thu, 20 Mar 1997 20:23:09 -0500, Frank Kahle <frank@igs.net> wrote: >This was issued to IGS customers. I have decided to post this to the >General public to get some "REAL" info out there. > >Frank > >*********************** 56K Modem News **************************** > >We have had a lot of queries about 56K Modems. In our honest Opinion >its a >lot more Hype than reality. Yes we will support 56K modems and we will >probably (at least initially) support the Motorola/Lucent/Rockwell K56 Hmm, I guess we know what sort of chipsets are used in the modems that ISG is using :>. Basically every ISP that has announced which of the two protocols they'll be using are ISPs who are currently using hardware which will be upgradable to that protocol, everything else they say is little more then justification to the users who own modems which will not be compatible with the ISPs hardware. Of course, given the fact that ISP hardware runs at about $600+ per port, this isn't too suprising. >'Standard'. Of course we will also support the final standard when it >comes out. US Robotics is shipping its X2 56K product (actually 53K) >but >they are not yet shipping the server software yet, and if you have to The server code shipped over a week ago. >upgrade your sportster it will cost you $60 USD. Please be careful with The $60 upgrade for Sportsters is likely to be one of the cheapest upgrades availible. >this technology, its a lot more hype than fact at this point. However >don't believe me see the followinf sources. > > >http://www.zdnet.com/wsources/content/970312/56k_review.html > >http://www.pcweek.com/news/0303/03modem.html > >http://www.cnet.com/Content/Reviews/Hands/030397/robotics.html It should be noted that the PCWeek review (and I believe the C/Net review as well) were conducted over a kinda poor quality PBX system, and not over standard phone lines. Average connect speeds for people using X2 at the moment are about 40-48kbps, with some connections ranging from about 33-52kbps. At the moment there are no K56Flex server modems shipping, although Ascend is planning on shipping before the end of March. As for the client side modems, USR's have been out for a while, and seem to be reasonably stable, although still buggy (as is to be expected of any products that are less then a month old), same goes with PPI and Cardinal who are also shipping modems based on USR's X2 protocol. Motorola has shipped some client side K56Flex, but has since recalled them due to a bug in the Rockwell chipset they wer using. A couple of other companies have shipped K56Flex client side modems as well, but the verdict is still out on them since there is currently no way to test these modems (you need a server side K56Flex modem to test them, and as mentioned above, there are no server side K56Flex modems shipping to the public). Anthony Hill | Sig files? SIG FILES?! What the ahill@travel-net.com | hell do I need a sig file for?!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3331f785.164115@nntp.uunet.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3331E2FD.395C@igs.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 105a5a,6c65b6632d2b81b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid105a5a,public X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,6c65b6632d2b81b1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public From: ahill@travel-net.com (Anthony Hill) Subject: Re: 56K Modems Date: 1997/03/21 Message-ID: <3331f785.164115@nntp.uunet.ca> X-Deja-AN: 227438427 References: <3331E2FD.395C@igs.net> Organization: UUNET Canada News Transport Newsgroups: ott.online,can.infohighway