🚀 go-pugleaf

I find it funny IGS.NET censored the bouchard page owner
yet back in the days when magusheidrun@igs.net (Heidrun Wischniwsky)
was pumping out sex spams to ont.general, complaints
to Frank Kahle <frank@host.igs.net> (the name on a 
whois search of igs.net) met amadant refusals to
do anything about it until, what, Chris Lewis had
to threaten IGS with a UDP? This post from dejanews
reveals much. Why the sudden, ummm, change in heart?

Subject:      Re: Fight Back!  Attack spammers who advertise web sites!
From:         pamstewa@nyx10.cs.du.edu (Patricia Steward)
Date:         1995/07/31
Message-Id:   <3vjdrf$kn8@nyx10.cs.du.edu>
References:   <3uebp7$a6m@paladin.american.edu> <caradoc-2207950107440001@ppp-236-102.neta.com>
Organization: /usr/lib/news/organi[sz]ation
Newsgroups:   alt.current-Events.net-Abuse,news.admin.net-Abuse.misc

In article <caradoc-2207950107440001@ppp-236-102.neta.com>,
John Groseclose <caradoc@neta.com> wrote:
>
>Note my .sig... Each site on the list has in one way or another stated
>that they don't care about what's going on out on Usenet or the WWW, so
>I've killfiled them. I've already gotten horrified e-mail from clients on
>three sites, asking why I've killfiled them.
>-- 
>caradoc@enet.net - John Groseclose - http://www.neta.com/~caradoc
>The following sites' posts are no longer accepted by my site:
>aol.com prodigy.com compuserve.com ios.com iia.org io.org azgate.com
>infoplus.com mordor.com

Well, here's another one you can add:  IGS.NET!  

I sent my standard one-line qustion in response to a commercial post from 
their site, and this is the answer I got back (you'll see my message and 
the post in question following the reply from igs.net: