🚀 go-pugleaf

Russell McOrmond (russell@flora.ottawa.on.ca) writes:
> In article <slrn58uj4m.is9.mcr@amaterasu.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>,
> Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ocunix.on.ca> wrote:
>>  The Karla Homolka group was one of the reasons that EFC was formed.
>>
>>  If you want EFC you run a test case, then probably some donations 
>> would be in order. 
> 
>   Is this the mandate of the EFC?  Will things work both ways: IE, if the 
> EFC is not able to get DONATIONS to run the test case, that they would 
> stop harassing other organizations for not being willing to be that test 
> case?
> 
If the EFC feels all that mighty, why don't they open up their own web server
and let everyone who has questionable material post there. This way they can
put their money where their mouth is, rather than have a ISP like IGS go broke
as a test case. It seems that there are organizations that are happy to take
on a case on principle, but have little regards to the outcome with the people
involved. This is like a union forcing an employer out of business costing
it's member's jobs, who wins in that one???


Darrell Larose				        darrell@cesani.newforce.ca

 	"Living at risk is jumping off the cliff
	    and building your wings on the way down" (Ray Bradbury)