Thread View: ott.online
10 messages
10 total messages
Started by Dr. Flunk
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:57
notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: Dr. Flunk
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:57
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:57
7 lines
1402 bytes
1402 bytes
As someone already stated, Rogers is planning to decrease upstream caps to 192kbps. I think this has been in effect for me for the past couple of days, as I can't no longer send at speeds higher than this. Anyone else notice this?
Re: notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: Bob Carrick
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:13
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:13
18 lines
1881 bytes
1881 bytes
And they are capping downstream to 1.5 mbps. -- Bob http://www.carricksolutions.com - The largest PPPoE Help Website, including Tango Manager, EnterNet, WinPoET, MacPoET, Sympatico Access Manager, RASPPPoE, CFoS, NetVoyager, Broadjump SAM, Windows XP, Mac OS X & Networking "Dr. Flunk" <vcarter@nba.com> wrote in message news:PQMN8.308323$t8_.3368@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > As someone already stated, Rogers is planning to decrease upstream caps to > 192kbps. > > I think this has been in effect for me for the past couple of days, as I > can't no longer send at speeds higher than this. > > Anyone else notice this? > >
Re: notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: Anthony Tibbs
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:30
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:30
13 lines
1890 bytes
1890 bytes
So much for people touting that cable is much faster than DSL eh? "Dr. Flunk" <vcarter@nba.com> wrote in message news:PQMN8.308323$t8_.3368@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > As someone already stated, Rogers is planning to decrease upstream caps to > 192kbps. > > I think this has been in effect for me for the past couple of days, as I > can't no longer send at speeds higher than this. > > Anyone else notice this? > >
Re: notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: Darrell Larose
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:48
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:48
20 lines
1836 bytes
1836 bytes
It is except when bandwidth caps and data caps are in place "Anthony Tibbs" <wx_tibbs_nospam_please@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message news:1023910815.366504@ip195.istop.com... > So much for people touting that cable is much faster than DSL eh? > > "Dr. Flunk" <vcarter@nba.com> wrote in message > news:PQMN8.308323$t8_.3368@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > > As someone already stated, Rogers is planning to decrease upstream caps to > > 192kbps. > > > > I think this has been in effect for me for the past couple of days, as I > > can't no longer send at speeds higher than this. > > > > Anyone else notice this? > > > > > >
Re: notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: Phaedrus
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 20:40
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 20:40
10 lines
1573 bytes
1573 bytes
In article <ae8858$4pjfs$1@ID-139539.news.dfncis.de>, "Darrell Larose" <Darrell@istop.com> wrote: > It is except when bandwidth caps and data caps are in place Heh, right, like a Porsche is a lot faster than every other car on the road -- except when driving it on roads with speed limits and regulations. -ben
Re: notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: Dem
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 21:49
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 21:49
18 lines
1688 bytes
1688 bytes
There are two differenet types of service though. The one with a 192k speed cap is the cheapest one. "Dr. Flunk" <vcarter@nba.com> wrote in message news:PQMN8.308323$t8_.3368@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > As someone already stated, Rogers is planning to decrease upstream caps to > 192kbps. > > I think this has been in effect for me for the past couple of days, as I > can't no longer send at speeds higher than this. > > Anyone else notice this? > >
Re: notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: Pierre L
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:18
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:18
22 lines
2109 bytes
2109 bytes
Oh come on. Even at those speeds, I've never come more than halfway as fast as that with standard DSL on a good day. Pierre "Anthony Tibbs" <wx_tibbs_nospam_please@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message news:1023910815.366504@ip195.istop.com... > So much for people touting that cable is much faster than DSL eh? > > "Dr. Flunk" <vcarter@nba.com> wrote in message > news:PQMN8.308323$t8_.3368@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > > As someone already stated, Rogers is planning to decrease upstream caps to > > 192kbps. > > > > I think this has been in effect for me for the past couple of days, as I > > can't no longer send at speeds higher than this. > > > > Anyone else notice this? > > > > > >
Re: notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: TOMMY Tutalidge
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:14
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:14
12 lines
1640 bytes
1640 bytes
Probably too many people signing up that came from sympatico. That would explain it. "Dr. Flunk" wrote: > As someone already stated, Rogers is planning to decrease upstream caps to > 192kbps. > > I think this has been in effect for me for the past couple of days, as I > can't no longer send at speeds higher than this. > > Anyone else notice this?
Re: notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: Darrell Larose
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:17
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:17
11 lines
1625 bytes
1625 bytes
"Dem" <dem67@rogers.com> wrote in message news:xlPN8.309854$t8_.260482@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > There are two differenet types of service though. The one > with a 192k speed cap is the cheapest one. > > Wrong the cheapest one is Rogers Lite which is 128 kbps down/64 kbps up, the one with the 192 kbps up is the regular Rogers Hi-Speed Internet at $45/month. READ the post before you assume. Rogers is throttling the regular service back to speeds "UP TO" 1.5 mbps down/192 kbps up
Re: notice Rogers bandwidth caps?
Author: Darrell Larose
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:18
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:18
32 lines
2068 bytes
2068 bytes
My DSL I get 160 kbps up, or 20 KB/sec. "Pierre L" <pierrot51@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:YMPN8.264465$ah_.105367@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > Oh come on. Even at those speeds, I've never come more than halfway as fast > as that with standard DSL on a good day. > Pierre > > "Anthony Tibbs" <wx_tibbs_nospam_please@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message > news:1023910815.366504@ip195.istop.com... > > So much for people touting that cable is much faster than DSL eh? > > > > "Dr. Flunk" <vcarter@nba.com> wrote in message > > news:PQMN8.308323$t8_.3368@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > > > As someone already stated, Rogers is planning to decrease upstream caps > to > > > 192kbps. > > > > > > I think this has been in effect for me for the past couple of days, as I > > > can't no longer send at speeds higher than this. > > > > > > Anyone else notice this? > > > > > > > > > > > >
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads