Article View: ott.vietnamese
Article #11Re: Richness of debate
From: Kim Nguyen
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 02:15
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 02:15
23 lines
1574 bytes
1574 bytes
In article <1992Oct9.232047.21140@cunews.carleton.ca> nguyen@turing.scs.carleton.ca (H.H. Nguyen) writes: >In article <knguyen-071092110241@knguyen.emr.ca> knguyen@emr.ca (Khanh Kim Nguyen) writes: >>Hi, >>If some of you subscribe to newsgroup * soc.culture.vietnamese * you will >>regcognize that although it supposes to concentrate on social and culture >>issues, but that forum shows that you can not single political view out. We >>cannot separate those three issues which intermingle in our life. >>Let it go that way to enrich our debate. Back in our homeland, we did not >>have >>a chance to put any issue on an operation table. Now with this facility, >>let it >>boom . The winners are we. >> > It seems that you have got one debate in hand already: It is the >debate of debating vs non-debating about Quebec, Canada, etc. >Looking from another angle, it is using debate, discussion vs. reading, >listening to music to address the current constitutional issues. > > Happy debating ! Or happy book reading, music listening, >depending on your personal preferences ! > --------- Stunned by your posting in alt.vietnam war. It's great.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct12.021543.13288@emr1.emr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!cunews!nrcnet0!emr1!knguyenReferences:
<knguyen-071092110241@knguyen.emr.ca> <1992Oct9.232047.21140@cunews.carleton.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: ott.vietnamese Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!cunews!nrcnet0!emr1!knguyen From: knguyen@emr1.emr.ca (Kim Nguyen) Subject: Re: Richness of debate Message-ID: <1992Oct12.021543.13288@emr1.emr.ca> Organization: Energy, Mines, and Resources, Ottawa References: <knguyen-071092110241@knguyen.emr.ca> <1992Oct9.232047.21140@cunews.carleton.ca> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 02:15:43 GMT Lines: 23