🚀 go-pugleaf

> >I think the operative word here would be "unreasonably". I seems like a real
> >double standard to me to feel it reasonable that two members of the OPPOSITE sex
> >can discuss the possibility of a sexual liaison, but if two members of the same
> >sex have a similar conversation, one might be liable to receive a busted nose.
>
> You have a very bad habit of taking what people say out of context. The reply about
> "busted noses" never said I would hit you etc.

Thank god for that! I'm a total coward <g>


> Matter of fact I posted a full answer
> yet again you choose to leave that out. You and Sue both have a bad habit of
> judging other peoples standards then sitting back and acting holier then god.

Isn't that what usenet is for??


> >I have no desire to have sex with a man, but I wouldn't attack anyone for asking
> >me if I'd be interested.... so long as it was done in an appropriate way and in
> >appropriate surroundings.
>
> Again.....never said you did, but the fact applies if you start chatting up a another
> male say in a pub at Mt druitt you will be lucky to end up with just a broken nose.
> I dare say that it is because of the attitute that Homosexuals prefer to gather
> in one spot   ie. Oxford Street.

At least if we're sure all the pooftahs are in congregating on Oxford Street, we know our
menfolk are safe to walk the streets elswhere in Sydney! We can thus be sure they won't
catch the "gay polluting the atmosphere thereabouts!!

I wonder if we should set up barricades??

<snip>


> >By this I mean.... for example.... few women would appreciate me propositioning
> >them at a funeral! So long as normal guidelines are observed by all parties I
> >think I'd be more flattered than annoyed to think someone found me attractive
> >enough to ask!! <g>
>
> I have never been propositioned ( well to the best of my knowledge ) but then
> I am one ugly son of a bitch.

Freddie Mercury was no picture either... your chance may yet come along!! <g>