Article View: ozemail.users
Article #69Re: Call for new group.: alt.flame.roddles
From: Steve Frost
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 00:00
126 lines
5775 bytes
5775 bytes
Hi KrilliC, Some of us have "contraints" which encourage us to "hold back". Many times I've been tempted to let fly with both barrels. I haven't yet. Rod's a nice enough guy, as long as you don't have the temerity to disgree with him and contradict his stated position(s). He appears to be incapable of sustaining a reasoned argument in a friendly tone. Hence my "attack" on the weekend where I basically decided (quite dispassionately mind you) to give him back some of his own. Unfortunately I'm in a position of responsibility here with OzEmail, and no matter how much I try and differentiate between professional and personal posts, some people aren't going to notice the difference and will therefore think that OzEmail are attacking him (which isn't the case). As you noted in an earlier post, kill-filing is the best way to deal with it. Kind regards Steve On Mon, 19 Oct 1998 16:46:32 +1000, "KrilliC" <we@we.com> wrote: >well all I can say is just post your post whether they are replies to Rod or >not but just make your posts sound sensible and if Rod or whoever doesn't >like it and starts a personal attack on u then personally I wouldn't hold >back. It has happened to me and guess who won the battle. You should take >the attitude that if someone F***s with u then don't take a step back, >although I haven't seen recently Rods' posts for anyone take such action so >at present I would just ignore it until he or someone does. > >Chris Lewis wrote in message <362ADD52.724DADD8@bigpond.com>... >>KrilliC, >> >> >>> And u say that u don't instigate the problems. >> >>Just opeining a door to get us all out of the group! There's not point in >>clogging up the works with "mindless botting" as our troubled friend would >put >>it. >> >> >>> Why don't we just create a group for the three of U (i.e Rod, Chris and >to a >>> lesser extent Josh B). All I ever see u people post are the exact >opposite of >>> what Rod post whether he may be right or not (I'm not saying that Rod is >>> always correct) but from what I can see u have taken it upon yourself to >>> disagree with him just for the fact that you see a post from him. I have >to >>> say that Rod need to calm down a bit but but he isn't the only one who is >>> causing the flaming war, u are contibuting to it as much as he is, if not >>> more. >> >>Actually Rod and I have agreed on several points in the past. But on others >not. >>It's the 'nots' that are the problem, and the way his arguments (for want >of a >>more accurate term) are put that irritates the hell out of me and many, >many, >>many people. This iritation with Rod has led to the establishment of .web >pages >>dedicated to him and his unique style of debate. He's even won the >"Net.Kook of >>the Year" award - these aren't my sites - they're run by people who have >been >>driven SO mad by him they felt this was the only way to get their own back! >> >>As for Josh, if you actually look at the Josh/Rod interactions you'll find >they >>are almost ALL initiated by Rod. Josh makes a comment and Rod jumps down >his >>throat. >> >> >>> Take a leaf out of Steve's book if u don't like what he posts ignore him >>> unless he does a personal attack which I haven't seen him do untill u >>> instigated it first. >> >>There is a very old saying which I've always kept in mind - partly becasue >of my >>origins. It runs: >> >>"The British are a tolerant race but vicious when provoked". >> >>I've had a LOT of provocation, turned the other cheek MANY times and got >that >>slapped as well. This is just a means of getting us all out of the groups. >No >>'flame' intended - as such. I know you mean well, but until he's had REAL >go at >>you you won't understand fully why otherwise reasonable people find it >necessary >>to behave like we do. By the way - Rod CAN'T 'calm down'. When I said he's >>physocally incapable of leting someone else get the last word I meant it. >Have >>you followed any of his threads? If you do you'll see what I mean. >> >>Trust me - would I lie to you??? :)) >> >>-- >> >>Chris (Keeping the dream alive) >>NSW >> >>---------------------------------- >>The difference between a duck is that one of its legs are both the same. >>---------------------------------- >> >> > -- ******************************************************************** Stephen Frost Email: frostbyt@shell02.ozemail.com.au Managing Director Web: http://www.frostbyte.com.au Frostbyte Consulting Pty Ltd "There ain't no disguising the truth" -------------------------------------------------------------------- Consultants to Australia's best ISPs: OzEmail Limited and Access One -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please remove the 'shell02' if emailing me or the mail will bounce.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<362ad500.29464988@news.ozemail.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<362AD5F0.282EB69F@bigpond.com> <70elk4$q42$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> <362ADD52.724DADD8@bigpond.com> <70enda$sof$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1083c4,964674c982856a95 X-Google-Attributes: gid1083c4,public X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,964674c982856a95 X-Google-Attributes: gid10df0c,public X-Google-Thread: 103b3f,964674c982856a95 X-Google-Attributes: gid103b3f,public From: frostbyt@shell02.ozemail.com.au (Steve Frost) Subject: Re: Call for new group.: alt.flame.roddles Date: 1998/10/19 Message-ID: <362ad500.29464988@news.ozemail.com.au> X-Deja-AN: 402727782 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <362AD5F0.282EB69F@bigpond.com> <70elk4$q42$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> <362ADD52.724DADD8@bigpond.com> <70enda$sof$1@reader1.reader.news.ozemail.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Frostbyte Consulting Pty Ltd Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: ozemail.users,aus.politics,aus.general