🚀 go-pugleaf

> >> You dont actually appear to have a 'name'
>
> >> A reputation on the other hand...
>
> > As the expression goes, "I wish to clear my name" (read: reputation)....
>
> It was a joke joyce. 'Josh B' ?  Geddit ?  Obviously not.

Oh, hahahaha. Mind if I don't laugh too much? It isn't very funny.

> > The way you said that was in a smart-arse way that was demeaning.
>
> Still doesnt qualify as a flame war Josh.
>
> I didnt realise you were such a delicate little flower Josh.
> Did you burst into tears ?  I'm very sorry, truly really I am.

Can you kiss me better?

> > If you were to say "Is there evidence that this really is true?" and
> > I then said what I did, then yes, I would have started the flame war.
> > However, the smart-arse and the abusing tone taken technically
> > means you started the flame war by provoking me.
>
> How odd that Chris doesnt even mention flame wars in the bit you deleted.

Ok, let me rephrase the reply to you when you replied to Chris.

--------------------
> > As for Josh, if you actually look at the Josh/Rod interactions
> > you'll find they are almost ALL initiated by Rod. Josh makes
> > a comment and Rod jumps down his throat.
>
> I cant make up my mind if you really do believe this sort of
> thing or if you know damned well its a lie and claim it anyway.

Sorry rod, but it's true.

I have only started about 3 hostile interactions.------------------

> > As I said, I invite people to do so.
>
> Then there's the tiny matter of what they are guaranteed to find when they do
> too.

Yes, it is a tiny matter - a tiny matter because it doesn't exist.

> >>> I have only talked to you in one usenet group.
>
> >> That claim is easy to check too. Its wrong.
>
> > That is one claim you can NEVER substantiate.
>
> Trivial to substantiate actually. Ever heard of DejaNews Josh ?

Sure have. I have NEVER used more usenet groups than I have said below. You are
extremley mistaken.

> > I have only ever posted messages in 9 newsgroups,
> > 4 of those have been the ozemail.* groups, and one is
> > the aus.students for which the reference is sighted.
>
> Still wrong. Still trivial to check.

IT IS NOT WRONG. IT IS TOTALLY TRUE.

If you believe this, then please check.

> > Yes it was.
>
> You claiming black is white too Josh ?

Aparently some fashion mags believe this ;-)

> > I have only said this line twice in any newsgroups,

No it's not. Look, this is stupid. I don't believe you are arguing a completley
wrong point. However, I am not giving up on this point.

> Still wrong.

No it isn't.

> Just like you were wrong when
> you previously said you only said it once.

I only posted to the NG twice. I don't try and remember that time in my life.

> > and unless you know me personally off the web,
> > you will never have heard it from me elsewhere.
>
> Never said a word about 'elsewhere'.

I know - this is qualifying the point further.

> > I invite you, or anyone else, to look through my
> > posts in ozemail.* groups, or any usenet groups.
>
> Dont expect anyone is actually hanging out for your invite Josh.

Are you, because you still seem to be claiming I have said that phrase more than
once.