🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by mcs Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:39
no good air where are the lawyers
#18
Author: mcs
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:39
6 lines
1650 bytes
no good air especially in areas with less then 30 percent of the time having 
good air  produces bad things if staticians and researches really wanted to 
publish and tv producers wanted to tell you the consequences, The people who 
live in these areas have huge disadvantages. This is the biggest real 
conspiracy that is allowed to poison people and continue  of all time. 
Bigger then cigarette conspiracy to hide damage 
Re: no good air where are the lawyers
#19
Author: mcs
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 05:42
115 lines
6271 bytes
This is the biggest conspiracy of all time. I never ever thought america
would be like this
Cigarette companies knew of the damage
Who will ever sue the car makers and coal makers and oil refineries?
The fact that our tv stations talk about health effects of  one study on
vitamin e but ignore that we are number one or two in the nation for
respiratory deaths, more asthma then most every city, rated f, and now or
soon almost more days then any city in the US for particulate pollution or
without getting good days of air .. shows me this is a conspiracy that goes
unrivaled in modern history. No one cares to protect people equally! Its
amazing, I feel the pain and its not my fault!
Collectively if and I say IF they wanted to prove more lethal damage they
could. I have written Universities to show level of health between two
populations who ate the same thing but breathed big differences in particle
pollution. They hung up on me. The literally don't care! Its amazing.

in the meantime people will suffer knowingly or most hopeful to
>> politicians
>> unknowingly
>> I listed some things that we have that are horrible for a city, how can
>> one not see how things are connected, yet people like to argue the air is
>> not bad.
> American Lung Association rates our city an F for air quality
>
>> Number one or two in asthma and asthma doctors, and death by asthmaHere 
>> are the most recent links , of cities with most asthma,
> Here is the link to 2006 most asthma link
> http://www.asthmacapital.com/asthma_capitals2006.pdf
>
> 2007
> http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=79126
>
>> Number one or two the number of days our air reaches moderate levels the
>> kind that one study says does more harm then good if you exercise in it 
>> and
>> the kind which automatically constricts lungs and a host of other 
>> horrible
>> things ( the fact that they even did the studies surprises me)
>> F rating my American Lung Association
>> The most depressed city in the nation
>
> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1359647/posts
>
>> After adjusting for age distribution of the population, female mortality
>> was 20 percent higher!!!! then average for the US and Male mortality was 
>> 33
>> percent higher then average! Is this healthy ? Or just a little bad?
>>
>> http://www.phila.gov/health/hp2010/P...emperature.pdf
>>
>> Bottom ten percent for air quality, in Sperlings list of cities.
> Even low levels or particulates which we get more often then most every 
> city in the US causes elevated risks of stroke
> Personally unlike some have said, I don't think the stats can get much 
> worse here
> http://www.americanheart.org/present...tifier=3045419
>
>>and a photo of my air filter after 29 days in air that had 18 moderate 
>>particulate days out of 29 or worse

http://s135.photobucket.com/albums/q141/stevephotobucket/?action=view&current=IMG_0118.jpg


>> We have NJ doing things , mandating emission control and California is 
>> going to stop using coal near their cities and
>> other towns get upset if they have three warning days, of air, here we
>> ignore it. The news media totally ignores all these correlations. Now I 
>> ask you why? Kids I urge your parents to ask politicians how you or 
>> family is
>> to stay healthy in air not conducive to exercise? Can anyone show me a 
>> link or magical way of doing that ?
>> how its done? How do you accept the possibility that when all areas of 
>> the country health is improving , in Philly its actually amongst the 
>> worse in several areas? Is there a magic reason for this? or for this to 
>> be ignored?
>
>> here we are blasted with ads for asthma and lung centers and you would 
>> not
>> believe that so many people still don't correlate our air being bad or 
>> the
>> city having problems
>> We have one of the worse violent crime rates in the US on ration basis 
>> and lowest percentage
>> of kids graduating, but its me that is the problem?
>> What world am I in?
>>
> Pa is number 2 in the country for asthma
>>
>>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>




"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote in message
news:hc6Eh.816$BE2.107@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
> Neolibertarian wrote:
>>
>> Nobody /doesn't/ want clean air and less violence, Cochise.
>>
> Boy, oh boy - do I ever wish /that/ was true!


"mcs" <mcsantpollution@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:UH7Fh.15815$sv6.12361@trndny08...
> no good air especially in areas with less then 30 percent of the time 
> having good air  produces bad things if staticians and researches really 
> wanted to publish and tv producers wanted to tell you the consequences, 
> The people who live in these areas have huge disadvantages. This is the 
> biggest real conspiracy that is allowed to poison people and continue  of 
> all time. Bigger then cigarette conspiracy to hide damage
> 
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads