Article View: pa.general
Article #11Re: al gore's scientific proof
From: Frederick Arthur Furia
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 07:00
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1992 07:00
18 lines
1353 bytes
1353 bytes
In article <1cnq80INNba1@agate.berkeley.edu> bks@alfa.berkeley.edu (Bradley K. Sherman) writes: >In article <gcLDTB3w164w@cellar.org> techie@cellar.org (William A Bacon) writes: >> ... Happily, many competent scientists are labelling his [Gore's] >> pitch a complete fraud. ... > >Name four, and convince us that they are not frauds. > >All the competent scientists I know think that the environment is >in pretty big trouble. You're right on this, but I don't think the fact that the environment is in "pretty big trouble" is what these scientists are denying. What they (and probably most Americans) would say about the book is that it makes huge assumptions as to which problems need to be solved and how they should be addressed. Fred
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov2.070014.7021@Princeton.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!think.com!yale.edu!jvnc.net!princeton!der.Princeton.EDU!fafuriaReferences:
<gcLDTB3w164w@cellar.org> <1cnq80INNba1@agate.berkeley.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: pa.general,phl.misc,alt.conspiracy,talk.politics.misc,alt.activism Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!think.com!yale.edu!jvnc.net!princeton!der.Princeton.EDU!fafuria From: fafuria@der.Princeton.EDU (Frederick Arthur Furia) Subject: Re: al gore's scientific proof Message-ID: <1992Nov2.070014.7021@Princeton.EDU> Originator: news@nimaster Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: der.princeton.edu Organization: Princeton University References: <gcLDTB3w164w@cellar.org> <1cnq80INNba1@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1992 07:00:14 GMT Lines: 18