🚀 go-pugleaf

Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:26:32 -0600, junk bonds <ju@nk.moody> wrote:
> 
>> Scott wrote:
>>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:31:18 -0600, green lantern <no@evil.escapes>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> WDS wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 7, 11:56 pm, charleneco...@excite.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If OBAMA gets elected.. the Stock Market will crash
>>>>> Given the current market I guess Obama has already been elected then?
>>>> The partisan pro-Bama media would have you believe as much...
>>>
>>> Only because it is looking more likely 
>> No, only because THEY elevated him into contention, learn something, fool:
>>
>> http://www.mrc.org/SpecialReports/2008/obama/obama.asp
> 
> It's impossible to learn anything from a biased source like 
> the Media Research Center...a well known right wing 
> organization. 

Care to refute the numbers cited?

No?

You're done.

 > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Research_Center
 >
 > The Media Research Center has been discredited

The data cited has not, you LOSE again.

Oh, btw, do you find the Washington Post to be a 'biased source" too?

LOLOL!!!!!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/02/AR2008030202476.html

There was also little pickup when the Politico reported that a decade 
ago Obama visited Bernardine Dohrn and William Ayers, the 1960s radicals 
whose Weather Underground group was involved in two dozen bombings. And 
the issue of Obama's dealings with Rezko all but vanished after a brief 
flurry until the run-up to his trial, which begins today.

Similarly, there was scant media mention of Louis Farrakhan's support 
for Obama until Tim Russert challenged the senator to repudiate that 
support at last week's MSNBC debate -- making Russert the target of some 
liberal bloggers who say he went overboard on the issue.

Would Clinton have skated as easily if she were found to have visited 
radicals tied to violence? Or bought land from an indicted businessman, 
as in the Rezko case? Or if the pastor of her church had talked about 
"this racist United States of America," as the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who 
heads Obama's church, has?

That is hard to imagine. Clinton's complaints about media imbalance are 
buttressed by a new study from the Center for Media and Public Affairs. 
 From Dec. 16 through Feb. 19, it says, the three network newscasts 
aired reports that were 84 percent positive for Obama and 53 percent 
positive for Clinton. She scored higher on evaluations of policy and 
public performance, but that amounted to only 10 percent of the coverage.

On Friday, Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson told reporters there was a 
"staggering" gap between the Rezko coverage and the volume of questions 
he fielded about her indicted fundraiser, Norman Hsu.