🚀 go-pugleaf

b@bb.net wrote:
> 
> psg+@pitt.edu (Paul S Galvanek) Said this:
> 
> >Speech that includes public displays of nudity is going to be regulated
> >whether you like it not.  Public nudity is simply not acceptable behavior
> >in most communites and if a adult theater can be prevented from displaying
> >movie posters or handing out advertisements with nudity, women who go out
> >of the way to display themselves while breast feeding are sure going
> 
> How come it's so difficult for people to grasp CONTEXT?  If this woman
> was lustfully rubbing her breasts, and doing really sexually
> connotative things, that's one thing, but a woman breastfeeding is
> simply   FEEDING  a baby HUMAN BEING.  There is no sex there.  I
> wonder about those that actually have sexual thoughts when they see a
> woman breastfeeding.  I think they are the problem, not the
> breastfeeder.

Agreed. And so I propose that anyone who objects to public breastfeeding
be given the option of either ignoring the act or being forced to listen
at very close range to the screaming of a hungry infant.

-- 
Be kind to your       | When the going gets weird the weird turn pro.
neighbors even though | http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/
they be transgenic    | Now. chock full of uninteresting links.
chimerae.             |-- Genesis 19:1-13 - Hebrews 13:2 -- 
---- INCOMING! http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/incoming.html ---------
"Sarah Connor?" All UseNet and BitNet postings are copyrighted.