🚀 go-pugleaf

Alleycat wrote:
> 
> In article <jam81-1010960631340001@dialup179.cc.columbia.edu>, jam81@columbia.edu (Jake Minas) says:
> >
> >
> >I don't think anyone contends that sexual molestation is not nice.  But
> >spanking beyond (proper, or tolerable)  parenting methods?  What does this
> >mean?  The government intervenes and social services interferes with the
> >parenting relationship every time someone gets spanked?  If I had kids, I
> >imagine I wouldn't spank them.  But geez, if that were the standard of
> >physical abuse, government would be taking over tens of millions of
> >children.
> >
> >Jake Minas
> >Spanking "survivor"
> >Columbia Law School
> >jam81@columbia.edu
> 
> What I find strange in this twisted society is that governments are
> talking about charging parents for such a silly act, yet no penalty
> is given to parents who injest drugs and produce kids with mental
> problems.  Look at the girl in Canada who had three children that were
> mentally damaged by drugs, and is now pregnant with her fourth while
> still injesting all of those drugs.  Kids should have the right to
> sue their parents years later, or someone should be able to sue the
> parent on their behalf, certainly for this reason -- but something as
> trivial as spanking?  How ridiculous! -- Alleycat

and i bet when this parent that was injesting drugs during the prgnancy 
is sued, they will have lots to offer(theyll be broke, so sue????)
corey