🚀 go-pugleaf

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Gore & Our Military

Al Gore is claiming experience in military matters because he has been
the Vice-President. Here is a summary of that experience:

LIBERAL WARFARE
Copyright � 1999 Francis Martino


  Bill Clinton has been America's most "liberal" President. His actions
reveal the way liberals think as a group. As you read the following
notes you will see that the liberal philosophy of "do-gooding" will
often end with negative results.

  For a specific example concerning the failed reasoning of Bill
Clinton's liberal philosophy, we may look at the history of his use of
the U.S. military which demonstrates:
  a) the abuse of power to promote political agendas
  b) the philosophy of Big Government attempting to solve all problems
  c) Bill Clinton's dealings are the result of him seeking prestige as a
great world leader which will gain benefits for him after he leaves the
White House, an honor which will provide him kind mention in the annals
of history and influence within the forming structure of the New World
Order.

  The New World Order, as defined below in the discussion on Haiti, has
as its objectives a one-world socialist government that will bring
redistribution of wealth, a philosophy that will appeal to the masses of
the poor and to the mind-set of liberal thinking, but a philosophy that
has been a demonstrated failure by the seventy years of collectivism and
redistribution within the Soviet Union, and fifty years of oppression in
the People's Republic of China.

  In the end, liberalism and the New World Order are not about helping
the poor, but are about the quest for power. Compare the philosophies of
liberal warfare with the reality of what has been accomplished in
pursuit of those liberal philosophies, and you will see that the liberal
use of military power is one of total fanaticism and abuse of power.

  Americans will soon be choosing between the two opposing philosophies
in our next election. It is important to realize how the Big Government
liberal philosophy has been implemented in Bill Clinton's sad
administration. The sadest part, of course, is that Bill Clinton was the
very best candidate the Democrats had to offer, and no other liberal,
due to the liberal mind-set, can be expected to exercise the
presidential powers in a way that will be less destructive than Bill
Clinton's demonstrated malfeasance.

Somalia

  The philosophical basis for entry of U.S. troops into Somalia was to
feed the starving masses and end the abuse caused by "war-lords," who
were the leaders of competing armed groups that sought to gain control
of the country. One could gain the impression from the State Department
and the news media that the war-lords were equivalent to roving
motor-cycle gangs that had guns and liked to shoot up the countryside.
To stop the war-lords was to be a noble cause indeed. What the State
Department and news media failed to present is that the "war-lords" were
armed factions in a civil war who were indeed competing for control of
their country.

  Several nations representing the UN were involved in the action, and
it was their leadership which was deluded by their own wishful thinking
that feeding the poor would put an end to a civil war. U.S. troops were
then placed under a non-American military commander.

  The problem arose when the war-lords took armed action against U.S.
troops. At that time it became apparent that the war-lords were not just
gangs, but were indeed remnants of the Somalian army who did indeed
maintain both the character and weaponry of an organized army.  That is
indeed something that should indeed have been known by the State
Department prior to sending Americans troops into the combat zone.

  Eighteen American soldiers then died at the hands of enemy gunfire in
Somalia. The sad story is that they did indeed die for the exact and
explicit reason that reinforcements of their besieged position was
denied by the American leadership.

  When reinforcements of armored vehicles and air support were requested
by the highest U.S. Commander in Somalia, Bill Clinton gave direct
orders to that commander to NOT SEND to those soldiers the armament they
not only needed but for which they were literally on their radios
begging during a period of eight hours. It was bad enough that the UN
commander refused to permit the defense of our troops, but Bill Clinton
also refused a direct request, having been advised by the U.S. Commander
that the American soldiers would surely perish.

  "Political posturing" designed to both make Clinton's policy look good
and to uphold Clinton's standing in the political realm of the New World
Order was put ahead of the lives of our young servicemen. As a result,
eighteen U.S. soldiers literally paid with their lives on a military
crap-shoot that Bill Clinton hoped would make him look good.

  His direct order as Commander-in-Chief to refuse aid to our troops at
their time of need gave aid and comfort to the enemy by allowing the
enemy to slaughter our troops. Let there be no doubt that the death of
our soldiers in Somalia was neither a consequence of war nor an
unfortunate act of war, but rather, it was the result of Bill Clinton
knowingly and willingly allowing those men to die. Bill Clinton had
aided and abetted the enemy by his nonfeasence and thus had committed a
wanton act of treason for his own personal gain.

  Consider the pattern of involvement:
  a) Clinton proposes an idealogical mission of "do-gooding"
  b) Clinton proposes the use of Big Government power to solve the
problems of Somalia
  c) Clinton organizes the UN to participate and thus gain his
credentials as a New World Order leader. Let there be no doubt that
without U.S. involvement, the UN would never have entered Somalia.
  c) Clinton's actions become detrimental to American interests: he
knowingly allowed American soldiers to die needlessly by his direct
order.
  d) the policy was a failure: The "war-lords" which Clinton claimed he
wanted to stop are now in control of Somalia, the people continue to
starve under the new dictatorship, and the wall of silence from the news
media is called "peace."


Haiti

  Clinton declared that he would take action to topple the Haitian
government and re-establish democracy. His declaration came three days
after the Black Congressional Congress told him that if he did not
invade Haiti then they would not vote for Hillary's healthcare program.
The invasion began, and the U.S. military was used to advance Clinton's
domestic political agenda.

  Clinton, the UN, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (a
group which comprises the New World Order and which has recently been
joined by NATO in the Kosovo affair) have ruled Haiti as a dictatorship,
disregarding any effort at allowing the Haitian Presidency and Parliment
to have any significant influence in Haiti's internal affairs.

Clinton controlled the Haitian government by withholding monetary aid to
Haiti. Prior to the embargo and invasion, Haitian exports to the U.S.
totaled 570 million dollars per year. The first year following the end
of the embargo, exports totaled 270 million dollars. The second year was
at 290 million.

The Haitian economy had been devastated. Businesses had left Haiti and
were established elsewhere. Neither those businesses nor the jobs that
they offered will ever return to Haiti.

When Clinton withheld aid, the Haitian government realized that after a
few weeks, the economy would be further devasted. The Haitian people had
no choice. They had to submit or starve.

Both the Haitian parliment and the masses demanded a constitutional
amendment that would be specifically for allowing the popularily elected
and later deposed Jean Bertrand Aristide to serve as President for
approximately three additional years which would have allowed him extra
time to compensate for his exile. It would have brought his time in the
Presidency to a full seventy-two months (six years), the length of time
for which his term called for.

The Haitian Constitution has provision for ammendment. A vote by the
people would have been overwhelming in favor of the ammendment, as would
have been a vote by parliment.

Bill Clinton forbid the election for ammendment. He needed to claim that
democracy had been restored by virtue of Aristide being succeeded by an
election. Aristide was succeeeded by Preval.

Clinton made his claim that he established democracy in Haiti just
before the American election four years ago. His refusal to allow the
ammendment was for the benefit of his own political agenda, that is, he
wanted a foreign policy "success" to herald before his re-election.

Thus, both Clinton's entry into Haiti and the governmental process of
Haiti were implemented for Bill Clinton's personal political agenda. The
New World Order was glad to go for the ride not only in Haiti but later
in Kosovo. The UN has been emboldened and is now attempting to form a
standing army of its own, which Bill Clinton has endorsed.

The New World Order is no longer for maintaining peace, but for
establishing a reign of power. As we have seen in Haiti and Kosovo, once
the New World Order moves into a country, the economic, political and
military aspects of that country are taken out of the hands of the
people whom they claim to serve.

  The Haitian people realized that their government was a puppet of the
New World Order's global government philosophies and, as a result, they
did not participate in the last parlimentary election, an election which
they had realized was futile. As a result of Clinton's arrogance in
disregarding the need of the Haitian people to participate in their own
destiny, democracy in Haiti is in name only. The Haitian people may be
poor, but they are not stupid.

  Consider the pattern of involvement:
  a) Clinton proposes an idealogical mission of "do-gooding"
  b) Clinton proposes the use of Big Government to solve the problems of
Haiti
  c) Clinton organizes the UN to participate and thus furthers his
credentials as a New World Order leader. Let there be no doubt that
without U.S. involvement the UN would never have entered Haiti.
  c) Clinton's actions become detrimental to American interests: He used
the U.S. military as a pawn to gain votes for a domestic issue. One
American soldier was killed in Haiti at a check point at which the
enemy, who was either a member of the deposed Haitian army or perhaps
the ton-ton macoute, chose to open fire rather than surrender his
weapon. Once again, an American soldier died in a civil war that was not
ours to fight.
  d) although their may be hope for the future in the distant years
ahead, the results thus far is that democracy remains elusive in Haiti,
the New World Order has caused resentment and apathy among the Haitian
people, law and order has not been maintained as bands of robbers called
the "zenglados" increase their activity, and the wall of silence from
the news media is called "democracy."

Sudan and Afganistan

  Clinton bombed Sudan and Afghanistan immediately upon the news that
his DNA was found on Monica Lewinsky's dress (which demonstrated both
his perjury and obstruction of justice in the Paula Jones hearing). His
decision to bomb was made while he was vacationing at Martha's Vineyard
and without consultation with his military advisors. It was a decision
that indeed diverted the public's attention from the proof of his
perjury, obstruction of justice, and corruption of the judicial process
in the Paula Jones hearing.

  Louis Freeh, FBI Director, was investigating the bombings of our
embassies in Africa. Upon hearing that Clinton solved the case while
vacationing, Freeh packed up, left Africa, and returned home with no
conclusion on the bombings, and no need to investigate further. Thus,
Louis Freeh was not allowed to gather evidence that would lead to a
conclusion.

  To this day there is no evidence to show who was indeed behind the
bombings, no evidence to show that the pharmaceutical plant in Sudan was
manufacturing anything but medicine, and no evidence to show that
ownership of that plant was by any terrorist or group of terrorists.

  Innocent people were killed as a result of that bombing. It was a
bombing of a country that
had normal and friendly relations with the U.S., a bombing that was
without provocation, without reason, without cause, without effect,
without a strategic military advantage. Such a
bombing is the absolute and maximum abuse of military power that causes
innocent people to die for political expediency and political expediency
alone. The people who died in that blast were just as much murdered as
the forty million Russian and Ukranians who were starved to death by
Stalin for the glory of the utopian society.

 The wall of silence from the news media is called "retaliation."

Iraq

  Clinton began bombing Iraq on the eve of the day his impeachment
hearing was scheduled to begin in the House. As a result of the bombing,
today there are no UN inspectors in Iraq, and Hussein is busily
developing biological weapons and delivery systems with absolute
impunity. Clinton had no plan to prevent weapons making in Iraq after
both the bombing and the withdrawal/expulsion of inspectors, but rather
he ordered bombing for the very sake of distracting the public's
attention from his committed perjury and obstruction of justice in the
Paula Jones hearing that was about to be publically presented during the
impeachment proceedings. Due to Clinton's malfeasence, the Middle East
will soon be flooded with terrorists who will possess chemical and
biological weapons that will be supplied by Saddam Hussein.

  All the reasons Clinton gave for bombing Iraq were as valid ten months
earlier, and he could have indeed bombed ten months earlier without
anyone questioning his motives. However, with Clinton's administration,
all timing of events revolves around political expediency.

  The bombing was in line with Clinton's defensive strategy of delaying
and obstructing the proceedings of any investigation of wrong-doing
within his administration. His bombing of Iraq had succeeded in delaying
for one day but not for the extended period for which Clinton had no
doubt hoped. That bombing spree in Iraq, as was the one in Kosovo and
Serbia, had neither an entrance nor exit strategy that would allow a
reasonable fulfillment of national or mid-east interests.

  Saddam Hussein's victory has been total, the liberals will continue to
call Clinton a great president, and the wall of silence from the news
media is called "protecting their liberal hero."

Kosovo

  Clinton announced that he would take some action in Kosovo the day
after his acquittal in a Senate trial that mocked justice. The plans for
the NATO effort in Kosovo had been planned since early 1998 . The NATO
commander formally ordered the bombing in the fall of 1998, a command
that would not be implemented until Bill Clinton gave the OK. Again, the
military venture in Kosovo would not have been undertaken without the
U.S. being involved to supply the military armament. Clinton, once
again, took his position as a leader of the New World Order.

  Instead of bombing immediately after acquittal, Clinton began the
bombing shortly afterward when the news of nuclear technology transfer
to China from the Los Alamos Laboratory became public, something which
everyone in Washington knew had been coming for months via the Cox
Report.

  As a result of the Senate investigation, the following has been
learned: the Los Alamos nuclear lab managers wanted to examine Wen Ho
Lee's computer whom they suspected of espionage.  However, the managers
were given warnings by Justice Department lawyers who stated that they
feared the search would taint information for use in court.

  In 1998, 288 wire taps were requested by the FBI, only one was
refused. The tap that was refused was the wire tap that would have
tapped Wen Ho Lee. Janet Reno testified that that request never reached
her desk, thus insulating her and Clinton from the technology transfer.
Reno would have us believe that she was not aware of a criminal
investigation of Wen Ho Lee that had been on-going since 1996, an
investigation concerning the theft of all of our nuclear weapons
technology.

  Today the Clinton administation tells us that all of our nuclear
secrets have been transferred to the People's Republic of China, but no
one knows who, no one knows when, and no one knows how.

  So it was that the public's attention to Clinton's perjury and
obstruction of justice, plus every Democratic Senator swearing under
oath that Clinton did not commit perjury, thereby committing perjury
themselves, plus the facts surrounding Clinton and the Democratic Party
having received eleven million dollars in illegal campaign contributions
from interests in the far east who have ties to the People's Republic of
China, and the fact that the criminal investigation of the theft of our
nuclear secrets was obstructed by the Attorney General were all diverted
from the public's attention by the sounds of bombs exploding in a far
distant land.

  The Kosovo war was one in which Clinton violated the Constitutional
mandate that treaties ratified by the U.S. Senate be the law of the land
unless rescinded by the Senate. The UN treaty requires that member
states never war against other member states except in self-defense.

  Human Rights Watch, in a press release of March 3, 1998, chastises the
Serbs for excessive force in putting down an insurrection by the Kosovo
Libration Army (KLA) in an area of seven to ten Kosovar villages. The
report indicates that a fire-fight did indeed take place and began when
Serbian policemen were killed. While criticizing the Serbs for the loss
of civilian lives, Human Rights Watch did acknowledge the need of the
Serbians to defend against armed attack.

  The operations of the KLA since its creation have been not only to
kill Serbian soldiers and Serbian government employees, but also to kill
Kosovars who were employed by the Serbian government.

  The Serbs had participated in the Dayton peace accords for three
years. The result was that the Serbs had brought Kosovars into the
government and established their apparent standard procedure for
engaging in fire-fights only when the KLA opened fire first. It was
indeed a great improvement in the behaviour of the Serbs and indeed
should have been recognized as a geat step in resolving human rights
violations.

  However, when there is a New World Order to be built, power and
influence to be gained, and a diversion of the American public's
attention away from the perjury and obstruction of justice that was
emmanating from the White House and the Justice Department, and the
weakening of our national security, all then becomes fair in war, even
if it is someone else's civil war.

  The Rambouillet Agreement which was being forced on the Serbs by the
Clinton administration would have divided the country of Serbia and
created an independent Kosovo. The Rambouillet agreement was ineed a
nullification of the Dayton peace accords. The Serbs then defended their
homeland the only way they knew how: by resorting to the tactics of the
civil war that had been waged for centuries. They were indeed the same
tactics used against them when over a million Serbs were driven out of
their homes in Croatia and Bosnia seven years earlier and that not only
without repatriation but also in the prescence of 30,000 NATO
"peacekeepers." The Serbs indeed had to resort to the use of the only
tactic at their disposal, that being the expulsion of the people who had
become, once again, their enemy, an enemy that was about to tear Serbia
in half and that with the assistance and pressure of Bill Clinton and
the New World Order. The response of Serbia was indeed to the dismay of
the Clinton administration and the Western Europeans and who knew not
the culture of that regional civil war, and who were indeed so blinded
by visions of grandeur that they could not see the reality of that civil
war once again emerging.

  The betrayal of the positive efforts toward human rights that the
Serbs had indeed accomplished, and the betrayal of the Dayton Peace
Accord by the Clinton Administration, an accord which could have been
Clinton's finest hour, led the Serbs to do what is common when nations
are betrayed and when their homeland needs to be defended. Thousands of
Kosovar civilians were killed by the ensuing brutal and re-kindled
centuries old civil warfare, and thousands of Serbian civilians were
then killed by U.S. and NATO warplanes who were ordered by Clinton to
bomb from such high altitudes that it was impossible to bomb with
certainty and with accuracy.

  The desire of one man to have the American public look away from his
misdeeds and to have history look upon him kindly, held precedent over
the desire of the Serbians to have peace with the Albanians.

  Consider the pattern of involvement in Kosovo:
  a) Clinton proposes an idealogical mission of "do-gooding"
  b) Clinton proposes the use of Big Government to solve the problems of
Kosovo
  c) Clinton organizes NATO to participate and thus furthers his
credentials as a New World Order leader. Let there be no doubt that
without U.S. involvement NATO would never have entered the civil war in
Kosovo.
  c) Clinton's actions become detrimental to American interests: He used
the U.S. military as a pawn to distract the public's attention from a
series of unlawful activities by himself and others within the
Democratic Party, and that at a cost of billions of U.S. taxpayers
dollars which paid for the ordinance that destroyed a country's
infrastructure, needlessly impoverishing a nation for decades to come.

  Such is the liberal philosophy and the liberal mind-set in regard to
the use of American military power and the New World Order. It borders
on dimentia.

  Does America need another four years of a liberal Commander-in-Chief?