🚀 go-pugleaf

"Charlie Wilkes" <charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote in message
news:p2q8kuo0lpfg64l1o2p1hi455ivl1dim33@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 12:41:44 -0700, "Dave Thompson"
> <dav13795@wdmdx1.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Charlie Wilkes" <charlie_wilkes@easynews.com> wrote in message
> >news:cfe8ku0nin8s69osucl2gon4mh4m6i7njr@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 02:47:34 -0700, "gatt" <gatt@hevanet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >>> I don't like Bush either, but her rhetorical style is hopelessly
> >> >>> pompous and faux-Daniel-Webster precious, especially for this
mud-pit.
> >> >>> Get with it lady... this ain't the U.S. Senate.
> >> >
> >> >>The U.S. Senate should be so straight-forward.  What was posted was
> >simply
> >> >a list of beliefs, offered >unapologetically.
> >> >>
> >> >>Hell, YOU should be so straight-forward.
> >> >
> >> >Well, I like both your responses more than the others and tend to
agree
> >with
> >> >both.
> >> >
> >> >She uses the words "wacko right-wingers" which immediately lowers her
> >point
> >> >to that of those who would call her "wacko", and she refers to TIPS as
> >> >"fascist and insane" which is little more than paranoid hyperbole.
This
> >>
> >> She's probably quite comfortable with the "spy on your neighbor"
> >> programs in place in Castro's Cuba.
> >
> >Really? How do you know that?
>
> Because it is a far more radical intrusion on people's privacy than
> anything proposed in the U.S. Congress.

Actually it's not. It's pretty much the same.

Care to take me up on this?


 She doesn't care, though,
> because one of her fellow left-wingers is behind it, so she figgers it
> must be ok.

Of course you have no idea. You're just mouthing off.



>
> I am frequently appalled by the glibness and superficiality of liberal
> positions.

The same way I'm apalled by the conservatives. Guess what - you have no
moral high-ground.



> >
> >
> >>
> >> I'll bet she thinks the U.S. gov't is criminal for its AIDS policies,
> >
> >Why?

Care to answer that one?

> >
> >
> >> but she probably is quite understanding of Fidel's need to just lock
> >> the faggots up.
> >
> >I rather doubt that.
> >
> >> Lliberals are like that, you know -- hypocrites to the core.
> >
> >You're not doing conservatives any service by posting such a contentless,
> >asinine rant.
> >
> >  They
> >> wouldn't be slinging their bullshit in my republic, I can tell you.
> >
> >So who is that supports dictatorships like Cuba? I'd say you're just as
bad
> >as you say she is.
> >
> And I'd say you're a liberal.

And you'd be wrong. I'd say you were a reactionary and I'd be right.

And I would also say you were a spineless coward.

 It sounds like you may be a terrorist
> sympathizer as well.  Homeland Security is reading this you know.

It sure is. Remember - if your party is abusing power then the next people
in power will surely do the same.

Enjoy looking over your shoulder. I'm just as much of a tipster as you are.

Oh - if you'd like to make some more veiled threats here's some news for
you. There's one area where I am like Muslims - I believe in an eye for an
eye for people that threaten me and my family.

See ya. Wink.