🚀 go-pugleaf

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software  - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


"John Bartley I solved my XP problems w/ Service Pack Linux"
<johnbartley@email.com> wrote in message
news:f90c7f43.0310070946.4935719a@posting.google.com...
> "Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:<vo44aqer3e7882@corp.supernews.com>...
> > Looks to me like the WSJ -Opinion- piece (and your post) is the
last-minute
> > political dirty tricks.  Particularly since they've not been
substantiated -
> > it's just allegations at this point.  Arnold's, peccadillo's, on the
other
> > hand, have been documented - and he's even admitted that they're
essentially
> > true.
>
> And he's apologized for _old_ behavior.

But not the behavior on the set of his last movie?  We're not talking just
"old" behavior here, we're talking ongoing.

>
> Davis' alleged behavior, however, is still perpetrating - and, isn't
> it funny how the anti-Arnold folks are not sourced, whereas the WSJ
> has _named_ a _credible_ witness?

On the contrary - some of Arnold's accusers have been identified, and some
of his grouping was on camera - the identities are not in question.  And do
provide a link to the WSJ editorial naming your so-called "credible
witness".  'Cause I went there and could find nothing.

>
> Unfortunately, the timing of the D's allegations are such that there
> is not time to find names and bring their accusors into the light.
> Evil that is which doth not love the light, as granny always said.

Apparently you're mentally impaired, so I'll type it slow:  Arnold .
admitted . to . sexually . assaulting . multiple . women.  And . he .
admitted . they . didn't . like . it.