🚀 go-pugleaf

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software  - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Jim B" <macheteblade@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:owMgb.2220$dn6.1175@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> news:vo729j6tebmp64@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> >
> > "Jim B" <macheteblade@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:%fIgb.1954$dn6.1592@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > >
> > > "Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> > > news:vo6hnc4kavj14d@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > "WitchDr" <Witch--Dr@usa.nojunkmail.net.ru> wrote in message
> > > > news:FoHgb.26424$9a7.6723@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> > > > > "Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:vo64avos2p3a86@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > > > Apparently you're mentally impaired, so I'll type it slow:
Arnold
> .
> > > > > > admitted . to . sexually . assaulting . multiple . women.  And .
> he
> > .
> > > > > > admitted . they . didn't . like . it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please cite where Arnold admitted to sexually assaulting multiple
> > women.
> > > > He
> > > > > admitted to poor behavior, sexual assault is not what he admitted
> to.
> > > > >
> > > > And just what was that "poor behavior" if not sexual assault?
> > >
> > > Lessee....  biting the bottom lip of a woman he was raping.....  NO
> WAIT!
> > > That's Bill Klinton....
> > >
> > > NEVER MIND
> > >
> > You got any evidence of that "rape"?  If you do, several different
> > prosecutors would like to hear from you.
>
> Just like state prosecutors would like to be enlightened about Arnold
> committing sexual crimes?  At least one named woman has described Klinton
as
> a rapist.

If you're talking Broaddrick, she signed an affidavit denying any sexual
contact with Clinton.  Prosecutors did look at her story.  Intensely.  They
decided she wasn't a reliable witness, and she may have had a profit motive
for changing her story.

>If liberals gave so much faith and belief to Anita Hill, they
> should at least show some consistancy when one of their own is accused,
with
> a far more believable story.

Prosecutors did look at her story.  Intensely.  They decided she wasn't a
reliable witness, and that she may have had a profit motive for changing her
story.

>But no.  Liberals are first and formost
> HYPOCRITICS.
>
Not nearly the hypocrites that the conservatives are.