🚀 go-pugleaf

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software  - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Jim B" <macheteblade@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:_Apgb.558$av5.35@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Baxter" <lbax01.spamguard@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> news:vo44aqer3e7882@corp.supernews.com...
> > Looks to me like the WSJ -Opinion- piece (and your post) is the
> last-minute
> > political dirty tricks.
>
> Why is it dirty tricks to point out the LAT has for years sat on a story
> that casts Davis in a bad light?  It's no secret the LAT is pulling for
> Davis, and the LAT's Editorials are now passing for news stories on the
> front page.
>
Because NONE of the allegations against Davis have been substantiated>

>
>  "Since at least 1997, the Times has been sitting on
> information that Gov. Gray Davis is an 'office batterer' who has
> attacked female members of his staff, thrown objects at subservients and
> launched into
> red-faced fits, screaming the f-word until staffers cower."
>
>
> Particularly since they've not been substantiated -
> > it's just allegations at this point.  Arnold's, peccadillo's, on the
other
> > hand, have been documented - and he's even admitted that they're
> essentially
> > true.
>
> Do Californians really want a short-fused violent socialist nutcase as
gov?
>
Do Californians really want a serial groper airhead as governor?  Someone
owned by Enron that will insure that California's fiscal problems will
continue?