🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: pdx.general
Article #1512

Re: Those D*MN Californians invade the Pacific Northwest again,.....

#1512
From: Steven
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:39
69 lines
4395 bytes
Lobby Dosser wrote:
> Don Homuth <dhomuthoneatcomcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:05:55 -0700, lein <boomer_the_cat@my-deja.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>On Jun 26, 2:02 pm, Don Homuth <dhomuthoneatcomcast.net> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:38:17 -0700, pjb...@webtv.net (Paul J. Berg)
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >.....California Sea Lions that is.
> >>>
> >>> >California sea lions have eaten what appears to be a record number
> >>> >of spring chinook salmon at Bonneville Dam, the U.S. Army Corps of
> >>> >Engineers reports.
> >>>
> >>> Proper animal control means culling that herd.  If the salmon runs
> >>> were larger, the predation numbers wouldn't be so critical.  But
> >>> since the run sizes are small, then the predation should be limited.
> >>>
> >>> However it can be done.  If the animals can't be hazed away with
> >>> non-lethal methods, then killing them outright can be justified as a
> >>> means of protecting the salmon run.
> >>
> >>Justified for what reason?
> >
> > Predation.  If we are to do wildlife management, then controlling the
> > number of predators and their effect is entirely reasonable.
> >
> > Remember when folks used to like to control the number of cougars
> > because they might be killing elk?
> >
> > 'Course, it turned out that the number of cougars had little to do
> > with the number of elk.  But we still control cougars that are too
> > adept at predation.
> >
> > Same thing with other predatory species.
> >
> >>The Sea Lions were here first
> >
> > First before what?  The salmon runs?  Probably not.  Sea lions weren't
> > known to be upstream in the Columbia in sufficient numbers to take one
> > of 25 salmon during historical times.
> >
> >>... and in the
> >>end, if you don't end up with smoked salmon on your plate, too bad.
> >
> > The smoked salmon on my plate doesn't come from the Columbia Runs.
> >
> > This is not about keeping the salmon runs for humans.  I'd support a
> > ban on commercial fishing for salmon as well, for example.  But the
> > sea lions have started a really bad habit -- and they appear to be
> > teaching others to indulge in it as well.
> >
> > We are the ones who emplaced the barriers that slow the fish runs so
> > that the sea lions have easy pickings below the dam.  If we wish to
> > keep the salmon runs intact, then it's up to us to find a way to
> > control the predation and the predators.
> >
> > Killing the ones who have migrated upstream will stop them from
> > teaching others to do the same sort of thing.
> >
> > It's not as though there's a shortage of sea lions, after all.
> >
>
> Looking for work are you?

Trying to boost the Oregon Food Bank, I'll bet.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1182951599.609508.68740@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <21355-46817939-961@storefull-3236.bay.webtv.net> <flv2835fphqs2i76lmcscbqd20jvhdbr2p@4ax.com> <1182891955.460892.30660@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <01038319325aehlvhov2i95oct9310nb2p@4ax.com> <Ofqgi.3250$%w5.1215@trndny04>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1128d6,d2fc4b02d2c388dc
X-Google-Thread: 111a85,d2fc4b02d2c388dc
X-Google-Thread: 104eff,d2fc4b02d2c388dc
X-Google-Thread: 111ebb,d2fc4b02d2c388dc
X-Google-Thread: 1141a2,d2fc4b02d2c388dc
X-Google-Attributes: gid1128d6,gid111a85,gid104eff,gid111ebb,gid1141a2,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  Steven <thisjukeboxplays33rpm@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: pdx.general,or.politics,ca.politics,wash.politics,alt.politics
Subject: Re: Those D*MN Californians invade the Pacific Northwest again,.....
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:39:59 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <1182951599.609508.68740@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
References: <21355-46817939-961@storefull-3236.bay.webtv.net>
   <flv2835fphqs2i76lmcscbqd20jvhdbr2p@4ax.com>
   <1182891955.460892.30660@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
   <01038319325aehlvhov2i95oct9310nb2p@4ax.com>
   <Ofqgi.3250$%w5.1215@trndny04>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.221.167.141
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1182951600 14452 127.0.0.1 (27 Jun 2007 13:40:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:40:00 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <Ofqgi.3250$%w5.1215@trndny04>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.221.167.141;
   posting-account=plHaig0AAACmp1qqzecBcWCjvDIRIL35