🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:29:39 -0600, ef_hutterite
<efhutterite@montanan.org> wrote:

>On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:31:46 -0700, Joyce Reynolds-Ward
><jrw@aracnet.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:15:04 -0600, ef_hutterite
>><efhutterite@montanan.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:46:31 -0700, Joyce Reynolds-Ward
>>><jrw@aracnet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:59:52 -0600, ef_hutterite
>>>><efhutterite@montanan.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:06:42 -0700, Joyce Reynolds-Ward
>>>>><jrw@aracnet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:43:55 -0600, ef_hutterite
>>>>>><efhutterite@montanan.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:46:03 -0700, Joyce Reynolds-Ward
>>>>>>><jrw@aracnet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Let's also not forget that loggers and sawmill workers also have to
>>>>>>>>cope with "farmer logs"--logs which have nails and such in them from
>>>>>>>>folks using trees as fence posts, as phone line poles, hanging camp
>>>>>>>>stuff from them, hanging crosspoles for hunting from 'em...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Let's point to an ambivalent former use as the moral equivalent of
>>>>>>>terrorist spiking?!?!?!?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's a well-known fact of life among REAL loggers, honey.
>>>>>
>>>>>And a non sequitur to protest spiking!
>>>>
>>>>Wake up and smell the cheesecake.  In some areas, how do you go about
>>>>telling the difference between deliberately planted spikes and farmer
>>>>logs?  You'd be surprised at how many of 'em show up on public land.
>>>
>>>Well that's real easy dearie, the eco-terrorists like to BRAG on their
>>>doings, that's how they COERCE people = TERROR!
>>>
>>>Got it yet sweets?
>>
>>Yawn.
>>
>>And this relates to what I wrote just how
>
>The strak difference in tactics andgoals!

Honey, to be comprehensible, you've gotta spell words correctly and
explain yourself coherently.

So far, you've flunked big-time.

>
>>>>>>Especially anyone who logs private land, as my spouse did to raise
>>>>>>money for college.  You think he'd spike his own trees on purpose?
>>>>>
>>>>>I think it's a non sequitur.
>>>>
>>>>I think you're trying to redefine reality to fit your ideology.
>>>
>>>YOU are the one trying to minimize and apologize for DELIBERATELY
>>>placed spikes, bitch!
>>
>>Yawn.
>>
>>Clearly you not only are a rude little flamer, you lack any exposure
>>or real-life experience.
>>
>>Typical right-wing fascist.
>>
>>Come tell me about it when you've grown up and bought a few clues.
>
>Pathetic waste of keystrokes, you got caught minimizing eco-terror and
>brought up short.


Yawn.  You've been caught out buying into fascist propaganda and have
no alternative but to swear and make false claims.

>>>You get no fucking quarter for being a lying propagandist!
>>
>>Yawn.
>>
>>Is that all you can do?
>>
>>Babycakes, if you want, I can outfucking outswear you.  I learned at
>>the knee of a muleskinner.
>>
>>As for being a "lying propagandist," methinks you doth protest too
>>much.
>
>I think it's evident you lack the goods.


Please elaborate.  Clearly all I've gotten from you so far is rehashed
War On Terror brainwashing drivel, profanity, and name-calling.

Is that how you make your case?

So far, you just come off as yet another brainwashed sheeple adoringly
regurgitating yet another bureaucrat's attempt to cover their ass.

>
>>>>>The subject is eco-terrorism.
>>>>
>>>>Like Gatt said (I have some similar experiences with the more straight
>>>>version of environmental activism in a different part of Oregon), the
>>>>proper terminology is "arson," "vandalism," and so on and so forth.
>>>
>>>I provided the proper dictionary and federal satute terminology, you
>>>fucking lying whore.
>>
>>My, my, my.
>>
>>Looks like I found that nice Big Red Button on your forehead.
>>
>>How much more frothing at the mouth can you get?
>>
>>>Don't liek it too damned bad, your LIES are summarily DISMISSED!
>>
>>Poooor baby, did I touch a nerve?
>>
>>Must have.
>>>
>>>>"Eco-terrorism" is hyperbole 
>>>
>>>FUCK YOU LYING CUNT - it is a FACT!
>>
>>Yawn.
>>
>>Oh, puhleeze (to the following quote).
>>
>>As usual, the Fibbies are behind the eight ball on this one and are
>>about ten years behind the times.
>
>As usual you got CAUGHT apologizing or eco-terror, ya tramp, fuck off.

My, I've gotta get to work to stir you up into yet another wave of
froth.

Although, I've gotta admit, "apologizing or eco-terror" is a classic
of typographical errors.

Then again, perhaps it takes one to know one, babycakes.
jrw