🚀 go-pugleaf

On 27 Jul 2006 21:33:10 -0700, "lein" <boomer_the_cat@my-deja.com>
wrote:

>
>Paul J. Berg wrote:
>> Curt wrote:
>> > "Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
>> > news:1439-44C6573B-269@storefull-3237.bay.webtv.net...
>> > >
>> > > From Albany (Oregon) Democrat-Herald ~ July 25, 2006
>> > >
>> > > Federal investigators in Oregon and across the country deserve credit
>> > > for their persistence in running to ground the so-called ecoterrorists
>> > > of "The Family."
>> >
>> > A more sensical term might be "saboteurs". Rather than "terrorists". I mean,
>> > seeing as no one was hurt in any of their silly "actions".
>> >
>> > No one's "terrorized" when you let a bunch of minks free or light an
>> > Escalade on fire on a dealer lot. They're "terrorized" when you blow up a
>> > women's clinic or burn a cross. See the difference?
>> >
>>
>> By Curt's reasoning, the bombing of a "women's clinic" would not be
>> terrorism if the clinic was unoccupied at the time. And, a cross
>> burning would not be terrorism if the only people present were Klan
>> members and/or Neo-Nazis.
>>
>> If the gas tank on the burning Escalade explodes, and kills an innocent
>> bystander or firefighter that is terrorism, no matter the intent of the
>> person who started the fire.
>>
>> And, for the person who let free "a bunch of minks", do they have any
>> idea of the fate of the minks or any innocent person would may come in
>> contact with the minks.
>
>
>Remember when the nutjobs released a bunch of minks and the minks
>ripped each other  appart?  I guess they never realized the reason why
>they are caged separately.
 
LOLOL!

Little bastards would have eaten Tre Arrow's nuts off.