🚀 go-pugleaf

On 25 Jul 2006 20:27:20 -0700, "Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net>
wrote:

>
>
>Curt wrote:
>> "Paul J. Berg" <pjberg@webtv.net> wrote in message
>> news:1439-44C6573B-269@storefull-3237.bay.webtv.net...
>> >
>> > From Albany (Oregon) Democrat-Herald ~ July 25, 2006
>> >
>> > Federal investigators in Oregon and across the country deserve credit
>> > for their persistence in running to ground the so-called ecoterrorists
>> > of "The Family."
>>
>> A more sensical term might be "saboteurs". Rather than "terrorists". I mean,
>> seeing as no one was hurt in any of their silly "actions".
>>
>> No one's "terrorized" when you let a bunch of minks free or light an
>> Escalade on fire on a dealer lot. They're "terrorized" when you blow up a
>> women's clinic or burn a cross. See the difference?
>>
>
>By Curt's reasoning, the bombing of a "women's clinic" would not be
>terrorism if the clinic was unoccupied at the time. And, a cross
>burning would not be terrorism if the only people present were Klan
>members and/or Neo-Nazis.
>
>If the gas tank on the burning Escalade explodes, and kills an innocent
>bystander or firefighter that is terrorism, no matter the intent of the
>person who started the fire.
>
>And, for the person who let free "a bunch of minks", do they have any
>idea of the fate of the minks or any innocent person would may come in
>contact with the minks.


Or their impact on the indigenous flora and fauna in the ecosystem?

Curt has classified himself as a world class bonehead apologist for
terror.

I knew the guy was a dumbass, but I'm shicked to see he's an
eco-terrorist too!